Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Steven Jones analyzes WTC dust samples

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
7,196
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Apr 16, 2008

This is an exerpt from Between The Lines, a documentary chronicling the research of Dr Steven E Jones and 9/11.

Category:

Education

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 4 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (lookbetween)

  • Looks like 'red oxide' to me, which sure, will produce a similar EDX spectrum to thermite. His results, in terms of micrograph presentation really should make one question the credibility of his conclusions.

  • @whoopwhoopwhoops show me the data, do some further work.

  • What a perfectly viable, scientific argument you've just presented.

see all

All Comments (90)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @lookbetween send me some WTC dust and I will quite happily generate my own data. I invite you to even come and sit next to me while recreating his methods - there really is nothing to hide.

  • I looked up crackpots and this video popped up

  • excellent video, thanks

  • You are quite right. The 1st vids that I saw of "Dr" Jones seemed to have some credibility. I have long since learned that his analyses were at best incomplete, at worst incompetant. Just another clown trying to use half truths to prove something that didn't happen. The classic "truther" tactic. I never really suspected thermite had been used, and with a little bit of persistance, I learned alot about WTC, various explosives, and human nature.

    Odd that "truthers" don't find the truth.

  • @biggbrattz So,Jones found nano-thermite based on that chemical signature? No.

    "The 'nanothermite' samples vary by about a factor of 10 in energy content. This nonuniformity proves it is not a "precision engineered" substance of any kind.

    The top end of energy content exceeds the theoretical maximum for thermite by a factor of two, and the observed content of nanothermite by a factor of five. The substance cannot be thermite of any type. Its 'contaminants' are, in fact, the dominant species."

  • @biggbrattz In some of the tests I've seen, there is no "explosion" the "therm*te" just vigorously burns. What type of paint you say could do this? Most kinds you put a propane torch flame to. You can get the same effect by sprinkling coarse black pepper onto the burner elements of an electric stove. If there is anything making it burn better is most likely some form of binder, the contaminates are the dominant species in the samples from Jones.

  • @biggbrattz "Particles with the 'chemical composition of thermite'. I accept his analysis."

    "Thermite isn't some high tech charge, it's rust, aluminum and an oxidizer.....In fact, in all of the improvised explsoive manuals, it's clearly explained how to make it" - Ron Craig (International Society of Explosives Engineers).

    An aluminum wheel on a rusty hub has the same chemical signature of nanothermite lol Jones could have found anything dude, most think it was primer paint.

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more