New dramatic video of China skyscraper fire in Shanghai

Four welders have been arrested on suspicion of accidentally starting the fire in a Shanghai skyscraper which killed 53 and injured over 70 people on Monday. The fire dominated the city's skyline before it was put out after more than four hours, with black smoke billowing through the sky. The government said more than 100 fire trucks battled the blaze.

RT on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/RTnews
RT on Twitter: http://twitter.com/RT_com

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• RT
• China fire
• caught on tape
• Shanghai fire
• tower fire
• China skyscraper
• China highrise
• high-rise fire
• China fire video
• apartment block fire
• Jing An Apartment Block
• Fire

[vgyu8gf68EatShit]

↓ ↓ ↓ ATTENTION ↓ ↓ ↓

@DxMama = Taiwanese SHIT-EATER

A 27-year-old Unemployed Taiwanese who suffers from Psychiatric Disorder in Canada. The sicko has problem with social interaction with people, so he has to channel his desire for communication in a perverted way and becomes an anti-China psycho and an “useful idiot” for media propaganda on YouTube 24 x 7 x 365.

Without work, he eats shit for a living and bullshits in Taiwanese English on YouTube with his 80+ accounts to seek attention.

[darealcase]

WTC 7...9/11 was a jewish job

[WeatherMondacicci]

@WeatherMondacicci Oh you're talking about WTC 7, gotcha. No, I don't think it was controlled demolition, I think it was a combination of fire and debris from the Twin Towers that did massive damage that caused it to loose structural integrity. There are pictures and videos showing damage to the southwest? side of WTC 7. As for it collapsing, one side fell first and then the rest fell.

[Moreofthesamez]

@WeatherMondacicci Building 7 did not have a "big ass" 757 slam into it and NIST's explanation of that collapse is that it was caused by office fires. This building is much worse than the WTC 7 fires which only burned on a few floors. Most defenders of the 911 myth say that WTC 7 was severely damaged by the collapsing Twin Towers but NIST makes no mention of that.

[WeatherMondacicci]

@Moreofthesamez Yes, but again they did not have two big ass Boeing 757's crash into them and shred their inner cores and at least several floors to pieces, not to mention everything else that caught on fire, that this building structural design is much more different and reinforced than the WTC, but you seem to love forgetting about that.

[Moreofthesamez]

@WeatherMondacicci Yeah nothing to offer, only this video of a skyscraper complete engulfed by a raging inferno and NOT collapsing, of course that's nothing to people whose new religion is Good Uncle Sam vs EVIL al Qaida and who willingly blind themselves to the obvious.....

[WeatherMondacicci]

@Moreofthesamez Love how you conspiracy theorists reduce yourself to insulting others when you have nothing to offer.

[Moreofthesamez]

@MKeyserSoze idiot

[Moreofthesamez]

@WeatherMondacicci "they had two big ass planes crash into them, thus weakening their structural integrity" hahahahaha, fuck off you pox ridden shill, idiot, moron, nobody listens to that rat vomit any more, the game is up...

[WeatherMondacicci]

For those who are comparing this to the WTC, First of all, the WTC was designed differently than this, also they had two big ass planes crash into them, thus weakening their structural integrity. This building in this only had a fire, and no, it wasn't fire alone that brought down the WTC but a combination of impact, fire, other things on fire and structural damage.

[bombarderoazul]

that's an intense fire, and the building didn't collapse!

[AvatarRoku1]

@MKeyserSoze ... because the whole thing was a .......*drum roll*...................... SETUP! To distract people from the real issues. Same as Anthony Wiener, or Casey Anthony, or the Koran burning guy, or Bin Laden's nineth death, etc, etc, etc.

You had best be trolling.