Stanford's Robotic Audi TTS

I'm pretty sure that I don't trust a robotic car where the researchers can't tell the difference between "continuous" and "continues".

kiss that car goodbye, did anyone notice that fat jew to the left @ 0:25, hes there to make sure the gas combustion engine stays alive after all him and all his jew and arab brothren make money from gas. i cant believe i saw that! why cant they jus kill them selves.

lol, you sound like my dad.

However, the film is related to the future, we will see.

Unless one bloke decided he could service his own car and bodges it up :p

I'd rather be in control thank you :p

@Octamed
dude...youe right
i feel like a idiot now
good way to look at it
but you never know....this may save so many lives and theyll start making laws that you need a auto car by law(im thinkin about america here...since i live in america) not that saving lives is a bad thing though

actually now you have a point ;) In Australia they're making ABS and electronic stability control mandatory. Which I personally thing is really REALLY dangerous because people vastly overestimate their vehicles physical ability (and their own). People need to know how to drive and anything less than fully automatic is dangerous. With 'half' auto cars you don't feel the car loosing it and that's bad. But if it looks good on the books then they make it law :|

@Octamed
i agree....that is pretty dangerous in australia
i wouldnt mind haveing a self driving car as long as i could trun the selfdriving off though
like if im taking a 7 hour trip then turning auto on
but if i was just driving around town are trying to have a fun drive and turn auto off...i wouldnt mind having that
and also another thing against this idea is
because its technolegy its going to mess up
it will mess up sooner or later no matter what

@Octamed
so it would really suck going 100mph or so then have it mess up and just spin out

its better have this technology that dont have it