Warthog Run on LAV

This was a run on a Canadian LAV to furher destroy the vehicle after it was disabled by an ied in Afghanistan.

Category:

Entertainment

Tags:

• Afghanistan
• Warthog
• LAV
• Canadian
• bomb

[K9Boom]

Unfortunately, I wasn't able to get closer to get a good view of the LAV when the Warthog bomb it. was able to get a couple pictures afterwards though.

[jon31072000]

I love how everyone else is quick to comment about us being "unfair" in the war. Like u coward towel head bastards fight fair. First you pick on civilian planes and fly them into civilian buildings. That is most coward of all. I hope we wipe you idiots out and take down anyone not willing to hand over the enemy. GO USA

[K9Boom]

nobody was killed in that explosion, and that particular explosion in the video was from a Warthog to further destroy the LAV which was disabled by an IED a few hours earlier in which six Canadian soldiers were injured.

[thejshorty98]

@IIZODIIAC Knowing how much times we have kicked taliban ass out of afghan and they still keep sending there troops into afghan thats a sighn saying even if we loose we will continue... if you know what i mean.

[IIZODIIAC]

@thejshorty98 they wouldnt be wasting their time if the people were actually capable of learning from their mistakes, if they didnt get involved in the war on terror then the war would be over quicker..

[thejshorty98]

@IIZODIIAC Thats kinda the point when your loosing is to not give up and keep sending in troops so the US eventualy gets tierd of wasting there time...

[IIZODIIAC]

lol "unfair" 1st of fucking all, why do these fuckwits become Taliban in the 1st place? we are there trying to remove them from the country and yet they make the job slower by making the problem worse and 2ndly we deserve our chance to fight back and thats exactly what we are doing.

[JackWarburton1]

How the fuck can they talk about unfair? Placing mines under rubbish and rubble is the most sly, cowardly form of warfare there is.

[Dolph78727]

(Cont)  some things; so it MUST be true. Yep it's easy to be the armchair quarterback & criticize. We're damned if we do, & damned if don't. If a small country needs our help from a brutal dictator & we took too long, then we're uncaring, & should be ashamed. Then the next time a country needs help & we come to help, then we're called warmongers or imperialist infidels. Our leaders are so concerned about our image & about not offending anyone; that it's made us appear too compromising & weak.

[Dolph78727]

I've been in both wars, the 1st Gulf War & this war, the "War on Terror." We've had our asses covered by those A10 pilots providing close air support on more than one occassion & watching the 30 mm GAU-8 Avenger rounds desimate a target is pretty awesome! I've seen what goes on there with my own eyes, not like so many of the people on these forums, who think they are so enlightened because they've heard some things from someone they admire, or they've searched all over the web and have read

[MrRagman93]

@jon31072000 Amen!

[HeadSHOT604]

@jon31072000 Your very dumb since the US is that biggest coward around >.> attacking countries that can't fight back and that haven't done anything...when the human race becomes a type 1 civilization USA will be the first to go.

[ablahblah54]

@Nitai83 Why in the world you guys think that, I have no idea. Having the towers go down would mean the American public would demand blood, and would lead to a war against a specific terrorist faction. From the beginning, it was clear that fighting against a group of people rather than a country would take awhile. And we can't just pull out without having flak thrown at us in the form of bombs and bad press. If we bombed our own towers, that essentially means that we WANTED shetloads of debt.