Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Jack the Ripper - In America - Documentary [part 1]

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
15,679
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Nov 8, 2010

Documentary about Jack the Ripper, was he James Kelly? You be the judge.

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 3 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (Jesusmalaark11)

  • no because "The Ripper" didnt strangle his victims.

  • @LESIMS2100 He strangled them to unconsciousness, then cutt their throats from left to right. Then he mutilated their bodies.

Top Comments

  • Why am I watching this at night?

Video Responses

This video is a response to Jack The Ripper Part 1 of 5
see all

All Comments (53)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @MrCrazycrac that's what I thought!

    Wasn't he from England?

  • how do u know the ripper never went to the us there were two rippers prince eddy and james maybrick was the other maybrick went to america on buisines both men killed differently both with different motives

  • Jack the Ripper.... The most brutal serial killer in history...

    Me: Oh for the godsakes *facepalm*

  • @ireland867 well he carved her face, this is the first time i ever heard anyone suggest it might have been an attempt at writing.

    in any case JTR was defined by what he took with him, not by what he left behind.

    although related in function, they are distinctly different acts to leave marks or take body parts.

  • @Whisper6911 he carved two letter V,s on eddows face

  • this does not fit the profile of jack the ripper.

    what is of particular significance in the JTR case is the immense violence directed at the genitals, i see no mention of that here.

    jack the ripper never left any marks on any victim, the only message that can be reasonably assumed to have been from jack is the one written on the wall where a part of his victims dress is found.

  • @MrCrazycrac that stupid cunt patricia cornwell started that bs. she is convinced walter sickert is jtr because of a circumstantial connection to one of the letters (the one probably written by a journalist) and the fact that she thinks his art is creepy.

    she spent 2 million pounds sterling to try and prove it, destroying one of the paintings in the process.

  • jack the ripper was in england not america get your facts straight he never went to the usa

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more