Top Comments
Video Responses
All Comments (812)
-
A stoned guy with a gun will be alot less dangerous than someone who is drunk with a gun, or on heavy pain meds
-
@Randomsauce77 You mean people wont see it any better???! darn... worth a shot, I at least got one idiot to read it
-
@TheHossUSMC I mentioned the government nowhere in my comment and my point was that normal people are totally entitled to it no questions asked but felons and people with handicaps should have to prove to the company or retailer that they are responsible
-
Excellent questions in terms of the video content. My opinion on one is that setting age limits via Government is useless at best. And you have made that point in a way, that literally one second too early and you go to jail, one second later and you're fine. It's the same with any age limit. I say, get the Government out of this, leave it up to the parents to decide for their kids. If not, well heck, there's already young teenage gang members out there "packing heat" as we speak.
-
i say the pre ban should be gone to many guns are hidden from the public by that
-
but im a bipolar, very responsible 15 year old.... o.O
reply to this
-
@longstar550 did you have to go to a family class to start one? I would think that maybe knowing how to be a responsible parent would be more important than knowing how to drive. Or how about using a hammer? Or maybe a shovel? Are these not dangerous items if used improperly? Your argument is based on the fear that something may or may not ever happen, and that is asinine. Speaking of driving... Did I miss the report that said there are NO accidents caused by licensed drivers?
-
@tatman8509 if you shoot and kill me by mistake please tell my family that you hard the right to irresponsibly own a firearm. why should owning a firearm be different from driving a car? We don't consider it unjust that we have to take a test to drive why should guns be different?
-
@longstar550 or how about you show me proof that you went through a culinary school, otherwise you may hurt yourself or others if you start a fire or don't know how to use a chef's knife. Sound asinine enough for you yet? Or how about registering your thoughts, you may be thinking about hurting someone and thus should prove you are not a threat by going to a school and paying for a license to think those thoughts. That is the basis of your argument... Sad, pathetic and naive.
-
@longstar550 ok, sure, the minute you get criminals to agree with the same requirements... Again, fear is NO reason to base a position that affects everyone else. I don't give a shit how safe you want to feel, you do NOT have the right to require ANYTHING of me or anyone else. If I hurt you I go to jail, with or without requirements, I still go to jail. So why if the sentence is the same would you make people pay for licensing so you could feel some illusion of safety?
The right to bear arms is absolute. Why can a 7 year old child go in to a hardware store and buy a hammer which he can use to kill someone while they sleep? Regulating every part of peoples lives is a slippery slope and goes against everything America was founded for, thats why I believe guns should not be regulated at all. They are tools which can be used in any way, for good or evil, government has no place in this matter, the responsibility is in the hands of the people to use tools safely.
WarThug13 3 weeks ago in playlist More videos from cutlerylover 3
@fullm3taldoc I know this is a little late, but your reasoning is flawed. You're right, they had muskets, and so did the government they were fighting. Are you seriously not aware that they no longer have muskets? So are you suggesting that we use muskets instead of AR 15's to fight the enemy that is using high tech weapons we supplied at one point or another? If revolution were to happen, would you not want to be as well armed as your enemy?
tatman8509 4 weeks ago