Mutah is proven from Quran - What about Sunni Misyaar? Who allowed Misyaar? Part 1/4

Muta is proven from Quran - What about Misyaar? Who allowed Misyaar? Part 1

Category:

Education

Tags:

• ABU
• BAKR
• BAKKAR
• OMER
• OMAR
• UMAR
• UMER
• USMAN
• UTHMAN
• OSMAN
• SUNNI
• CALIPHS
• KHALIFAH
• IMAM
• IMAMAT
• ALI
• HASAN
• HASSAN
• HUSSAIN
• HOSAIN
• HUSAIN
• MUHAMMAD
• RASOOL
• PROPHET
• INFALLIBLES
• BOOK
• QURAN
• DR
• ISRAR
• ZAKIR
• NAIK
• YAZID
• LAANTI
• ISHAQ
• MOLVI
• MAULANA
• MOLANA
• ARABIC
• URDU
• ENGLISH
• SALFI
• HANFI
• MALIKI
• SHAFI
• SUFI
• SOHARWARDI
• CHISHTI
• QADRI
• TAHIR
• UL
• YA
• MADAD
• MATAM
• ZANJEER
• ZANI
• SHIA
• MAJLIS
• SUFISM
• QADIYANI
• KAFIR
• KUFR
• KUFFAR
• AYESHA
• AISHA
• KHADEEJA
• FATIMA
• FATIMAH
• FADAK
• SAQIFAH
• JANAZA
• MAKKAH
• WAHABI
• HIJAZ
• MADINA
• NAAT
• HAZOOR
• HADEES

[SuperiorRationalism]

@artistdigital This is evidence that Umars act of prohibiting mutah is not for a legitimate reason and so his act of prohibiting mutah is unacceptable. So The Quranic verse 4:24 reveals about mutah, the Prophet permitted it, Umar forbade it but it is not accepted because he has no authority to do so.

[SuperiorRationalism]

@artistdig Narrated 'Imran bin Husain: "The Verse of Mut'a was revealed in Allah's Book, so we did it at the time of Allah's Apostle, and nothing was revealed in Quran to make it illegal, nor did the Prophet prohibit it till he died. But a man (who regarded it illegal) expressed what his own mind suggested."

• Sahih Bukhari Volume 6, Book 60, Number 43

As you read along that hadith (which I repeated for discussion) it can be seen that this "man" is Umar who expressed what his own mind suggested

[SuperiorRationalism]

@artistdigital Also Both Ibn Jarir al-Tabari and al-Zamakhshari narrated that:

"al-Hakam Ibn Ayniyah was asked if the verse of Mut'a of women is abrogated. He answered: 'No'."

• Tafsir al-Tabari, under commentary of verse 4:24 of Quran, v8, p178

• Tafsir al-Kashshaf, by al-Zamakhshari, under the verse 4:24, v1, p519

[SuperiorRationalism]

@artistdigital Umar's own son disagrees with his father's action!!!

"some one asked Abdullah Ibn Umar about Mut'a (of Hajj), he said: It is permitted (Halaal). So he was asked: your father forbade it. He said: Do you think that my father can forbid what the Prophet did? Should I follow what my father said, or should I follow what the Prophet ordered? The man said: Of course the orders of the Prophet (&HF)."

• Sahih al-Tirmidhi, v1, p157

• Tafsir al-Qurtubi, v2, p365, reported from al-Darqunti

[SuperiorRationalism]

@artistdigital Umar forbade Mutah but that is not acceptable. He had no authority to change the law of Allah and that is a big sin for him to forbid what Allah has legalised. Mutah is a mercy from Allah to his servants. There is NO MENTIONING in the Quran that states the abrogation of Mutah. So Umars act of forbidding mutah is unacceptable and to me he is no leader to have the right to do that.

[SuperiorRationalism]

@artistdigital • Tafsir Ibn Hayyan, v3, p218, under commentary of verse 4:24 of Quran;

• Tafsir Nisaboori, by al-Nisaboori (8th century);

• Ahkam al-Quran, by Jassas, v2, p179, under commentary of verse 4:24.

[SuperiorRationalism]

@artistdigital • Tafsir al-Kabir, by al-Tha'labi, under commentary of verse 4:24 of Quran;

• Tafsir al-Kabir, by Fakhr al-Razi, v3, p200, commentary of verse 4:24;

• Tafsir al-Kabir, by Ibn Jarir al-Tabari, under commentary of verse 4:24 with authentic chain of narrators, v8, p178, Tradition #9042;

• Tafsir al-Durr al-Manthoor, by al-Suyuti, v2, p140, from several chain of transmitters;

• Tafsir al-Qurtubi, v5, p130, under commentary of verse 4:24 of Quran;

[SuperiorRationalism]

@artistdigital Many authentic Sunni scholars confirm that the Quranic verse 4:24 was revealed about the Mut'a. They straightforwardly mentioned in their tafsiir of the Quranic verse 4:24 that temporary marriage became Halaal DUE TO the Quranic verse, but they assert that it was later prohibited.

These are some references from the sunni scholar's books to prove to you that the Quranic verse 4:24 is revealed for Mutah:

[SuperiorRationalism]

@artistdigital

(Except the forbidden women) the rest are lawful unto you to seek them with gifts from your property (i.e., dowry), provided that you desire protection (from sin), not fornication. So for whatever you have had of pleasure (Istamta'tum) with them by the contract, give unto them their appointed wages as a duty. And there is no sin for you in what you both agree (in extending the contract) after fulfilling the (first) duty. Lo! Allah is ever Knower, Wise. (Quran 4:24)

[SuperiorRationalism]

@artistdigital The Quranic verse 4:24 can be interpreted as the permissibility of mutah.