Intelligent design or blind chance.Why a default position?

Looking at our vantage point in space and time.
Are we informed enough to have a default position ?

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• intelligent design
• evolution
• creation
• richard dawkins
• william lane craig
• neil tyson
• albert einstein

[SShamit1]

And the field of Physics that completely eliminates the notion of intelligent design is quantum mechanics. It tells us that the universe and reality as we know it is just a illusion, the history of the universe is just a version of many possible histories the reason we observe the universe to be the way it is just a matter of probability, it is just a small part of a much larger picture the multiverse

[pestmanpat]

@SShamit1 With respect everything you just said is speculation.Even Penrose stated that Hawkins mutiverse theory is not even a theory.It is nothing more than a collection of ideas according to Penrose.

We still know so little about quantum physics that we have no business drawing any conclusions at least not yet.

[SShamit1]

i think u assumed that we cant know anything outside the creation of our universe, this is false in fact by observing the universe and event that created it we have some very good idea of the possible Multiverses, Parallel Realities etc.

[pestmanpat]

@SShamit1 This is funny .It seems i have made a video on every point you make to answer your point on how much we really can expect to know watch ''Intelligent design or blind chance.Why a default position?

[1tabligh]

Such a statement is highly *absurd* that order and rectitude should come about *without* a Creator, and disorder and impropriety of design and *fate* should suppose a Creator. He is an *ignoramus* who says this, because anything produced *without* design will ***never*** be exact and proportioned, while disorder and contrariness cannot co-exist with orderly design. Allah is far above what the *deluded and duped ignorant atheists* say.

[pestmanpat]

@tirua100 ''apparent'' design is a matter of opinion isn't it ? So long as you and i can cite highly educated people such as Einstein,Dawkins,Tyson,Craige,­Lennox and Hawking it will always be a matter of opinion.

RE: If you can, imagine that life came into existence naturally. What would you expect to see in regards to design?

I would expect you and i would not be having this conversation because no life would ever have arose.

[tirua100]

@pestmanpat

All a bit of a pointless distraction. There is only apparant design in the universe, design that you would expect if the universe and life came from naturalistic causes. There is nothing that implies an intellegent "designer", or at least not a particularly good designer.

If you can, imagine that life came into existence naturally. What would you expect to see in regards to design?

[SShamit1]

@pestmanpat Hawkings M-theory is based on super-string theory and the center of which is universe is the ultimate result of the laws of physics, god is unnecessary. the multiverse I mention is that of Evertt's Many World Interpretation, which is backed up by a considerable amount of evidence. Quantum Mechanics is mature enough to draw conclusions from and use as a tool of scientific methodology, we even use it in our technology

[pestmanpat]

@SShamit1 Watch my video'' Neil Tyson "' is he to stupid '" where i address this .