Béla Bartók - Music for Strings, Percussion and Celesta, III

Music for Strings, Percussion & Celesta, Sz. 106, BB 114 (1936)

I. Andante tranquillo
II. Allegro
III. Adagio
IV. Allegro molto

Chicago Symphony Orchestra
James Levine

Bartók wrote some of his finest music for the Swiss conductor Paul Sacher, in whom he found a particularly sympathetic champion. Music for Strings, Percussion and Celesta, written for Sacher in 1936, explores with great refinement and mastery the musical concepts that Bartók had been developing since the mid-'20s. In the Piano Concerto No. 1, Bartók explored the percussive elements of the piano, coupling it effectively with percussion only in the introduction to the concerto's slow movement. In Music for Strings, Percussion and Celesta, Bartók ingeniously sets the piano with the percussion instruments, where its melodic and harmonic material functions in support of the two string choirs.

Since the early '30s, Bartók had also incorporated elements of Baroque music into his compositions, inspired partly by his exploration of pre-Classical keyboard composers such as Scarlatti, Rameau and Couperin. In reflection of this, Music for Strings, Percussion and Celesta evokes the Baroque concerto grosso, with its two antiphonal string orchestras separated by a battery of tuned and untuned percussion instruments. The work's prosaic title was actually just a working title which was subsequently allowed to stand.

The opening movement, Andante tranquillo, is a slow fugue on a chromatic melody that springs from a five-note cell, each subsequent phrase growing in length and elaborating on its predecessor. At this point, the two string orchestras play together. As the string voices accumulate, the fugue's texture increases in complexity and the chromatic implications of the theme are brought to a rigorously dissonant fulfillment. The fugue climaxes at its apogee with an ominous rumble from the timpani and a loud stroke on the tam-tam. As the fugue folds in upon itself the celesta makes its first entrance with an arpeggiated chord, mysterious and remote. The work subsequently grows from the motivic material explored in this first movement.

Bartók deploys antiphonal string choirs for the second movement, a fast, fugitive piece in which the two orchestras chase each other through a breathtaking series of elaborations on the main theme. In the percussion section, piano, xylophone, and harp take the lead while two side drums (with and without snares) provide emphatic punctuation. The third movement is one of Bartók's most accomplished "night music" pieces, with cricket-like notes from the xylophone, eerie timpani glissandi, fragmentary murmurs, and frightened exclamations from the strings, along with the always-mysterious notes of the celesta floating clear and sphinx-like over the nocturnal weft. The finale, a dance of energy and abandon, restores the antiphonal deployment of the strings and juxtaposes the diatonic aspects of the work's main theme with its chromatic elements. There are also some striking touches like the furious, strummed four-note chords in the violins, violas and cellos that opens the movement, a theme midway through that is based on a repeated note first hammered out on piano and xylophone, and then a grand peroration of the initial fugue theme, now with its intervals doubled and richly harmonized. In the quick coda there is a brief, suspended moment ("a tempo allargando") before the work tumbles to a conclusion in unabashed A major. [Allmusic.com]

Art by Victor Brauner

Category:

Music

Tags:

• bartok
• levine
• music
• strings
• percussion
• celesta

[jdbrown371]

I was so moved I just bought it!

[Carlos111111able]

So different to the rest I´ve heard of chamber music. Imagine being on a romanian forest while listening to this at night. Shivering! This music comes from the deepest roots of the joys of darkness

[flexibartr]

I think this work belongs to the the class of rare pieces which are among the best and at the same time the most extreme ever.

[SuperJewbot]

i think avant-garde is always avant-garde. its pushes time out in front of us and time does nothing to it.

[AAceNo1]

@TheWanderingNight

At it's time it was considered avant guard and innovative, so the composition is innovative it's just that those innovations happened over half a century ago, just like Shonberg and Messiaen and less than half a century even Penderecki, and Stockhausen are no longer avant guard though at the time they were extremely different and new approaches. It is the 21st century now.

[TsanevMusic]

It is worth living just to hear music like this! 

[TsanevMusic]

This is such a beautiful performance!

[eeepictures]

Stanley Kubrik used this same music for The Shining! Very creepy stuff!

[domcogan]

Agreed. Beethoven's Grosse Fuge, Liszt's Mephisto Waltz, even some of Bach's Leipzig chorales are still avant-garde now. I've been playing and listening to Bartok for at least 20 years now, and he still has the power to surprise me!

[TheWanderingNight]

@doctorfuse007 Bartok wasn't exactly an avant-garde composer so much as he was an unpopular one at the time (he was less progressive than Schoenberg or Messiaen), but the term can be applied very broadly. Certainly though, just because a work is old, and has been used in films after the composer's death, doesn't mean it can't be avant-garde. Debussy himself was considered avant-garde at his time, but today he sounds as old as Chopin and Beethoven.

[doctorfuse007]

@ewparkentity this work is over three-quarters of a century old. It is used in Hollywood films. How, by any stretch of the imagination, is it avant garde?