Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

A Whole HEPA Trouble #1

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
3,837
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jan 22, 2012

7:00pm SPOT TEST OF HONEYWELL/KENMORE HEPA FILTERS: ~146 CPM^ or 351% of previous background HIGHER with second test coming in at 538% of normal!
5:50pm 10-minute INTERIOR background average:41.6 CPM^

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 3 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (EnviroReporter)

  • @EnviroReporter, i think it was ridiculous of you to jump on connectingdots1... a much better response would have been a gracious "thank you". we better figure out who our real advocates are, and i have found connectingdots to be one. calling everyone a "troll" gets our movement and our safety no further along! step back and think about this!

  • @femmecorbeau - This is another brainiac contribution to the round file of humanity. First off, no one asked connectingnada to write in to us attempting to degrade our 1,500+ radiation tests. No one here calls everyone a troll. No one here is part of the "we" you refer to or part of any "movement" that includes people more given to rumor and innuendo than trying to get the simplest facts straight. You two do no one, especially your safely anonymous selves, any favors with this nonsense.

see all

All Comments (24)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Loved your response that there SHOULD NOT be any radiation above background in the samples...right one the money. The fact they are way over background is enough. This is bad. This should not be, but it is a fact. Not good as no amount of additional radiation is good for us.

    Great video, better reporting, thank you!

    I also did not know that 3X over background is considered a Hazmat event...amazing.

  • @connectingdots1 - I approved this, folks, to show that pro-nukers and meltdown deniers have no monopoly on illiterate rambling attacks. I mean, can you even figure out what this person, who has been on YouTube since 2009, means when he tries to pull rank on an environmental investigative journalist who has been writing about these subjects since 1997? I need defending by this person? Not. You can dish it out but can't take being called on it. Sock puppet trolls write better than this gibberish.

  • Great report. Thanks

  • @EnviroReporter Bro are messed up or what?

    i specifically said tha I WASN'T implying your Geeiger was wrong and yes the Geiger I found to be wrong is almost the EXACT same model as you have but once AGAIN in NO way am I implying your Geiger is wrong and yes I assumed you only had one since it's all I ever since.

    If this is how you treat Truthers who've been making vids of Fukushima LONG before you showed up here then you can forget about me defending your vids from Trolls.

  • @connectingdots1 - umm, yes that was troll-like: Without knowing the first thing about them, you clearly suggest denigrate our Inspector Alerts, based on someone else's detector and "his was brand new also directly from coe." umm, ours wasn't from "coe" whatever that is. You also couldn't get straight how many Inspectors we have which was your premise. umm, you are implying false readings all the while claiming you're not. That is troll-like no matter what good work you do.

  • @EnviroReporter Troll-like? WTH are ya talking about?

    First off, I guess you forget how I was fighting off real Trolls in Realistnews forum who were trying to put down your findings.

    and 2ndly..I shared with you something that I personally experienced regarding Geigers, and specifically the brand your using in this video. Take it for what's worth but his was brand new also directly from coe.

    i even mentioned that I wasn't implying your Geiger was off but simply gave you advice.

  • @connectingdots1 - Your implausible troll-like comment attempts to suggest that our Inspector Alert is inaccurate. It clearly is not. This unit is brand new and one of the best in the business detecting alpha, beta, gamma and x-ray radiation with precision and accuracy. I've used Inspectors for over a dozen years and our website's 1,500+ tests since March 15, 2011 show just how accurate they are.

  • japans so far away yet its so dangerous.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more