Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Pt 2 Toyota's Unwanted Sudden Unintended Acceleration Recall - A Clash Of Tech

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
283 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Feb 19, 2010

Part 2
A good theory demonstrated with regard to Toyota's Unwanted Acceleration and the need for the FCC to revisit who and what Part 15 rules apply and standards going forward in the new mobile digital video and broadband plans.
Lives are clearly at risk as the number of mobile RF transmitters doubles every 2 years and more micro-controllers are in charge of devices that could be life threatening if interfered on.

  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (8)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Only Relevant Questions and Comments will be posted. Thanks !

  • @OVINDEX Glad U know difference of Computer Assisted and Computer Actuated

    Seen that neutral shift before. If you have model susceptible, keep your HFamps off especially when near metal structures (antenna match) I'm HAM also, studied in '77. Tests not the same now. More detail then in tests about this kind of stuff but no transistor & digital stuff.

    Yes, Scaring me is Computer Actuated Power Steering Assist. Imagine RF on pick-up sensor in steering column and how hard to steer if you can

  • As a ham radio guy, I understand this.

    I've seen many car problems from rfi but none of the problems were dangerous like transmissions that shift to neutral etc

    I did not know that some new cars are near complete electronic actuated. steering, brakes & gasfeed

    If they are going to be all computer control, they need to address this issue of RFI / EMI standards

    While I would never own a car built with computer actuation, I'm now scared that I may face one on road while using my equipment.

  • @kassandrasduplex Please read on Parasitic, Spurious & Harmonic radio signals & electromagnetic interference. Wikipedia is free

    Happens all the time but referring only to automotive cases, it takes stronger signal because of all the metal outside of it. Or low power transmitter inside.

    RF "strength" is relevant to power, distance and RF signal type

    RF on/in a sensor, gives computer a incorrect reading and computer will respond improper but correct for the input

    This is not limited to Toyota

  • Since when have the wiring harnesses in the ECU fuel and other engine systems EVER been proven to act as radio signal receivers?? And if this were even possible, barring harness damage such as shorts, we would be seeing this occur in a myriad of engine faults and failures across the spectrum, not just Toyota. You really need to stop screening and editing the users' comments to support your credibility.

  • @MootNews Yes it takes a bit more reading if not knowledgeable in Digital/Radio/Data/Electronics & RFI-EMI.

    If your not looking for what I I'm saying, everything will test/work fine.

    I plan a 3rd Vid for Youtube, direct to point with more data.

    Must be careful how much info I post. It allows those with bad intent to create havoc with fly-by-wire autos traveling.

    I want RFI resistance standards for all.

    I will do live tests (assumes finding a willing owner for test) when weather improves.

  • While looking-up many items in the presentation in wikipedia, I see exactly what you are speaking of. It took me over 12 hours of reading to understand this.

    It would be helpfull for people to understand if you get more info into your video but begs the question, why has nobody else figured this out?

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more