Interview of Hanna Giles & James O'Keefe
Top Comments
All Comments (20)
-
@PhilabustaBlue Alright, I'll go do that. You keep up the good work chanting your silly mantras at passersby.
-
@RighteousPaladin - like a true repug, totally ignoramus. Repug corruption usually doesn't get noticed until it's too late, like WallStreet, like Enron, like Iran contra, like the Carlyle group, like DeLay, and millions of innocent lives are destroyed. Where's ur little bitch ass there? U make ASSumptions and tell me about being 'fit to judge.' Mr. Self-Righteous so-called religious, u best re-read your book.
-
@PhilabustaBlue More blathering. Good luck arguing with your imaginary friends about banks and energy that have nothing to do with my comment or this video.
It's probably time to get over Bush or seek psychiatric help.
-
@RighteousPaladin -No, I'm not blathering at you. I'm pooping ON you. As a repug, a TRUE repug, it's natural for you to make ASSumptions and tell me what my rights are. Then what do repugs like you do? You talk about freedom. But when all the banks crashed, Bush cried there were no regulations in place??? Hmm. The same guy who said NO regulations on energy while Enron caused massive blackouts in California and drove it into debt, caused accidents, deaths, fires and more. U B 1-sided ass.
-
@PhilabustaBlue What's your argument here, Mr. Soros? Did you just log in after a month to get mad and blather at me?
-
@RighteousPaladin - Oh, yes sir, Mr. Genius, whatever you say. Hmmm, my party? Where'd I say that? Where'd I say it the dems are vindicated? I think you be the one judging. Your schtick is to listen to the mega-billionaire's radical right-wing main stream media channel and believe every lie they tell. Oh? It's not another "main stream" outlet, like the Post, like the Journal, like ALL talk radio? Who doesn't have the capacity?
-
@PhilabustaBlue You have neither the capacity nor the right to judge him. Your statement is merely an ad hominem to discredit the work that he does in exposing corruption; as all media claim they do.
Furthermore, the corruption of the Republicans is not to the extent of, nor does it vindicate the corruption of liberals. Your party's entire shtick is to appeal to the lusts of the flesh and make promises that they have no intention of fulfilling merely for the sake of grabbing power.
-
@RighteousPaladin -I don't think you get it. Of course there's corruption in the Dem party. Guess what? There's also corruption in the pub party. And so what is this little dickwad's point? In fact, I'd say what is really reprehensible is the amount of corruption and the extent of pub corruption. This little ass just wants to make a name for himself.
I'm certain that your response to my four month old comment made sense in your mind. Unfortunately you failed to draw a parallel between what I stated and the situation at hand. I know that the creatures that call themselves "liberal" hate to have their corruption exposed, but going so far as to manufacture a case over the perceived intentions of an investigative journalist is exceedingly reprehensible.
The only pigs squealing with delight are liberals who presume their evil is vindicated.
RighteousPaladin 2 years ago 6
I've often noticed that indefensibly guilty people will feign indignation once they are caught, whether shoplifters, serial killers or Clintons. It doesn't surprise me that the Acorn nuts follow suit.
RighteousPaladin 2 years ago 2