Hoodwinked at Shanksville: The Boeing 757 Challenge!

The FBI claims they recovered 95% of Flight 93 at Shanksville.

See if you can win The Boeing 757 Challenge!

http://hoodwinkedatshanksville.blogspot.com/2009/03/boeing-757-challenge.html

Category:

Nonprofits & Activism

Tags:

• 9/11
• conspiracy
• Flight
• Hoodwinked
• Shanksville
• United
• Airlines
• Boeing
• 757
• hoax
• 95%
• Killtown

[tjemail99]

So I don't get this video?

Are you saying that they buried the plane in a strip mine before 9/11 and then dug it up adterwords?

[WelcomeToKilltown]

@tjemail99 No, they just said it was buried, but nothing really was. They just staged the photographs of the engine in the crater to make it look like they had just unearthed it and of the one black box that looks like they had a photographer jump down in the excavated hole to photograph it. See, why pre-plant a whole ton of debris when you just have to stage a couple to make it look like they found some debris below.

See my two other 'Hoodwinked' videos about both of those.

[escalopin2]

To end all the speculations about if a plane crashed or not in Shanksville we should look at the official report and docket based in forensic investigation and identification by registration numbers of the plane parts recovered on site made by the NTSB in conjunction with the FBI. All the plane crashes in the USA should have a report and docket like this BY LAW.

But this official report an docket doesn't exists.

So, the logical conclusion is that no plane crashed in Shanksville the 9/11/2001.

[annebeck58]

You do know that is not even an engine (or engine part-- rotor) from that sort of plane, right?

Looks a LOT more like that from a F-16.

(go check out plane engines at PrattAndWhitneyAircraft of UnitedTechnologies).

Definitely wrong engine.

[zeroluck7779]

thanks great and verry funny video! on google earth befor the "crash shoot down" lies that same gouge is thear after 911 a gouge with a circle like crater right in the center hmmmmmmm bomb yes! plain no!! i bet my life on that. thanks again

[PhilGaithersburg1115]

@ruzziduzzi Chris, you really shoudn't post comments after the drink and the weed. You are 41, and your post is not one an adult would write.

[ruzziduzzi]

@PhilGaithersburg1115 who is also @ChrisDetroit011170 et al. Welcome back after having ur last user account banned by youtbe you SCUM? What was that you were doing? Posting the WRONG NAME AND ADDRESS of a TOTAL stranger over and over on a comment board? When cornered by facts, personally attack? Anyways, im glad ur figuring it out, YES RESPECT IS EARNED, no matter if i may disagree with killtown, at least he engages in a debate, NOT IN PERSONAL ATTACKS LIKE A CHILD or trying to invade my privacy

[PhilGaithersburg1115]

@ruzziduzzi Chris, you are posting as an adult here. Why are there no @KillCuntIOwn I hope U RESPECT MY VIEW AND THAT I AM not avoiding THINGS IM just not FUCKTARD CUNT FUCK happened is a

Respect Chris, respect

[ruzziduzzi]

@Killtown I hope u respect my views, and that im not avoiding things, im just not sure if the whole plane to car analogy is even right or applies. What is alleged to have happened is a plane crash, and certain facts dont change if eyewitnesses give conflicting reports or not. The 80%, the 45 feet deep, and 30 civics in a hole are all new claims to me quite frankly, and i dont have a problem if they are indeed accurate, but i dont feel comfortable agreeing to things that may have false premises.

[ruzziduzzi]

@Killtown ok till we agree the 80% is right (cuz i think the engines cld be 10-20% of the weight alone, plus wings and 2 landing gears thats alot of plane not going in the hole, and then if the person saying 80% means that 20% of the rear of the fuselage or the tail part didnt go in the hole, thats even less) i will for sake of argument assume its right or close to right, and say the photo of a dumpster of shredded debris is proof, and the size and depth of the hole does not preclude it being so