Flight 93 9/11 Mythbusters

How they used another myth to take down the flight 93 inside job myth

Category:

Education

Tags:

• RMB
• RMBVP
• SVC
• stridervcore
• myth
• mythbusters
• jezuzfreek777
• sxephil

[G0tta12]

So flight 93 hit a 1" steel plate and giant concrete block?

[stridervcore]

@G0tta12 hard packed solid ground is about the equivalent, lol. The plate descentegrated the car rather than pushed it back to the concrete block as seen from the video.

[dwgangsat]

@DIMATIF no...that was flight 77...

[aserbula]

your comparation is pathetic, you know absolutely nothing about physics, aerodynamics or the kinetic powers that take place in such crashes, simply put, so that U could understand: TWO 6 ton Rollys Royce engines made out of titanum alloys CANNOT be disintergrated (that is the correct word by the way) on impact on ANY surface, the speed to really disintegrate them would need to be PHENOMENAL

stay away from things you do not understand and cannot comprehend & don't mislead gullible people

[Markerxxmanny]

At least the guy in the car was ok.

[Poonard]

@stridervcore have you ever seen a photograph of a different airplane crash into the ground? Not United 93, just any other picture of an airplane which hit the ground? Please explain why there is obvious debris in other photographs of other planes which crashed into the ground, but not from United 93.

[Stillwater900]

I want you to look on Google images at photos of other plane crashes and compare. Planes just DO NOT vaporize, not matter how hard they hit. If you think it did, then why wasn't there any smoke?

[WeatherMondacicci]

how come you left the sound off the video?

[DIMATIF]

Wasn't flight 93 the one which hit the pentagon?

[jazzfan5000]

@G0tta12 No!! Flight 93 hit the ground at a speed of over 500 mph, idiot!!