Moon landing tapes got erased, NASA admits.

http://www.FunToWatch.TV My daddy Leo's brother, Ivan worked for NASA on Mercury first manned missions,Gemini missions and Apollo moon missions.
The original recordings of the first humans landing on the moon 40 years ago were erased and re-used, but newly restored copies of the original broadcast look even better, NASA officials said on Thursday.
My uncle Ivan used to send me the official Astronaut photos. I had the whole collection which I cherished, but unfortunately they were destroyed in a fire with many other personal belongings. I am very proud of my Uncle Ivan's achievements.
When I look at the moon, I remember him.

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• Moon
• landing
• tapes
• got
• erased
• NASA
• admits
• Stan
• Atamanchuk
• FunToWatch.TV
• Mercury
• first
• manned
• missions
• Gemini
• Apollo
• moon
• airport
• muse
• ovni
• sailor
• ufo

[JacoDeLucia]

The light beam moves at about 300,000,000 meters per second--knowing the round trip time for the laser beam sent to the Moon and back yields the distance to the Moon accurately and quite easily. You can't just remotely plop a mirror onto the Moon--it had to be placed there, unpacked and aligned by hand. Humans were there on the surface of the Moon to do that. Believe what you want, but humans did land on the Moon in 1969, despite all the rumors of hoaxes.

[libtechsk8er]

Jonny6296, did you know we have satellites sending images and other data much further away than Saturn? How can you deny the moon landing with the overwhelming evidence in support of it? You can't!

[greenfruitface]

I saw the moon landing on TV, so I know it was real. But there was a show called Godzilla on right after that, but I know for a fact it was fake.

[smithdsmit]

@JacoDeLucia I agree but you have to admit.It is pretty odd that the oringinal tapes of the most important scientific achievement ever.Was accidentally erased.I just find it hard to believe that they would accidentaly record over that.I have vhs tapes i was more careful with

[liellibg]

Why are there plans to build a rocket maybe three times as powerful than the saturn rockets. Because they need to be able to life a ship with a water shield. As a kid I watched many of the moon landings. But we now know it was not livetime unedited. All moon landing tapes gets lost. Thats like saying we lost the original declaration of independ. The last shuttle mission had a robot. Now no fly zones over supposed man landing sites. The writting is all over the walls. Old heros are had to let die

[BjornPalmen]

@44sd44 "what event was more important they needed to tape over the moon landing?"

Maybe the next moon landing? or the next? or the next? or the next? or the next? or Apollo 17?

[BjornPalmen]

@NewDirection4us They didn't have video tape back in 1969? The first magnetically-recorded time-delayed network television program using the new Ampex Quadruplex system was CBS's Douglas Edwards and the News on November 30, 1956. So you are wrong about this.

And you are wrong laughing at the Apollo photos.

Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin really shot all of those Apollo 11 still photos in such clarity and focus.

Your LOL exposes you as a fool, with clarity and focus.

[BjornPalmen]

@NewDirection4us Fact is, it was never discovered what happened to the original Australian recording of telemetry from the moon and Apollo 11. There were of course copies.

[BjornPalmen]

@truvelocity Actually I am not the one that shall present proof that the Moon exists.

Any conspiracy theorist should present proof that ANYTHING was faked. He cannot do that.

I have no wish whatsoever to "satisfy" people who are just plain wrong.

They owe the astronauts an apology.

[truvelocity]

@BjornPalmen I'm old enough to have watched the moon landing live. I have to say that no matter how much proof, it will never satisfy a die-hard conspiracy theorist.

[BjornPalmen]

@4thkind

'idiot' finds its origins in the ancient Greek word ἰδιώτης (idiōtēs), meaning a private person, a person who is not actively interested in politics; such characters were talked about with contempt and the word eventually acquired its modern meaning. (Wikipedia)

The word still fits people who have no interest in space travel.

[BjornPalmen]

@hempyuk

You said:"The only way we are ever going to know if they went there or not is for another country to go there like China or Russia and place there flag next to America's.."

There is a difficulty with that. How could you ever know that China or Russia really went there and that they did not fake it?

:DD