KJB Inspired? - Dr Schaap Part 3

No description available.

Category:

Education

Tags:

• schaap
• fugate
• bible
• hyles
• anderson
• fbc
• kjv
• kjb
• 1611

[daveme7]

Well first, it did have errors. Not so much that the bible was in error, but spelling was not yet uniform until later. Printing had not been perfected yet. So, basically, there was errors in the editions, but the KJV was not in error. This is the first time I heard someone bring up using various TR's

[WordofGod1611]

Agreed. There where typesetting errors, along with printing errors. There are, however, NO translation errors!

Bro Schaap phrases it in such a way that would lead someone to believe that it was a translation error.

[passport287]

I thought he said it had 22,000 errors? And that what we have is "very error free"...did I miss something? Seems a bit like a contradiction to me....

[WordofGod1611]

You are not the only one to think so!

[MrKyledude18]

umm excuse me but he just said there is 22,000 mistakes in the begining of it... near the end he says "I belive it is a perfect translation" sombody... anybody tell me how in the world can it be a perfect translation IF it had 22,000 mistakes!?!?!?!?!?!? he has gone far off the deep end!!!

[StreetPreaching1611]

@Imaginefree69 Um, I don't know what site you're copying that nonsense from, but it's all stupid lies and excuses to ignore the Word of God. The Bible has NEVER been proven false, yet time and again it has stymied scientists and been accurate against historians and archeologists.

Until you actually get serious and accept the Bible as God's perfect word, then you're not going to be taken seriously by anyone that matters.

[Imaginefree69]

The Bible says that humans are made of dirt.

And that snakes and donkeys talk.

And that insects have 4 legs.

And that bats are birds.

And that the earth is flat.

And that the sun revolves around the earth.

And that animals appeared AFTER man but BEFORE woman.

And you're on about which VERSION to use?

Wow.

[daveme7]

The point was this-Reagan did a sampeling of errors and by no means approached the errors and as I see it was representative of all the errors so called in the KJV. Of course since then I have been downloading all kinds of books from Google free books. Let me say there was quite a few more than one or two against new Greek text and new versions. Even found one that spoke of no need to revise the CZommon version i.e. KJV long before any 7th day adventists thought of this.

[daveme7]

Actually just dealt with this in a yahoo group. There is a pamphlet out called the myth of early revisions where the brother goes over much of this. Since then bought a book by James Price about a new sect the KJV. He had quite a few more errors then Reagan did and so I decided to go through these errors to see if i found anything different and guess what-they were all the same kind of errors as Re4agan in his publication. What is the point?

[huuhka5678]

Aamen Brother. You have right spirit, and you know things deeper, what those uneducated fanatics. Thank you about you truthful comment

[huuhka5678]

Schaap is the man of God like anyone else.

[huuhka5678]

Dr. Schaap is the man of God

[daveme7]

What I have seen is often times when dealing with certain subjects, we can all have our words and thoughts construed as heretical. What I am sayng is sometimes the imperciseness of how we say things can be turned the same way as to show us as heretics. To me, this is why it is so important to see all that one teaches in context with the reast of what he says.

[McKinneyMeister]

Depends on whether you're trying to "feel better" about your English translation or whether you want to know the truth. Is there something in this video that's not true? or just stuff that makes you "feel" unsettled?