Watch this video in a new window

Thermite on a Car

Thermite being used on a car. Video from Brainiac: Science Abuse  
 
Customize

More From: makenshi42

Loading...

QuickList(0)

67 ratings
Sign in to rate
59,182 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (0)

This video has no Responses. Be the first to Post a Video Response.
Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (82)   Options

Loading...
Perion (23 hours ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
watch?v=ySHgiUxnLC0
Kurabsence (1 week ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Why would there be thermite there, A we don't kill ourselves, B it's not the best thing to demolish ANYTHING, and of coarse, C burning jet fuel is plenty fucking hot to melt down steel beams, you try and give me a reason why it was there I'll listen.
Russoft (1 week ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
just gotta mention that jet fuel is similar to diesel. Not as exothermic as other fuels such as avgas or petrol. Apart from that, I tend to agree with you.
sumthing4me (3 weeks ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
come on
soliv27 (3 weeks ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Search on Bentham org website:
Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe
pp.7-31 (25) Authors: Niels H. Harrit, Jeffrey Farrer, Steven E. Jones, Kevin R. Ryan, Frank M. Legge, Daniel Farnsworth, Gregg Roberts, James R. Gourley, Bradley R. Larsen
(A PDF document)
its only 25 pages, you can read it it shows where it was collected, the methods, in english of course, several pictures, diagrams. 9 phycicians worked on it during 2 years
soliv27 (3 weeks ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
watch?v=8_tf25lx_3o
Niels Harrit with e in Niels
A danish scientist Niels Harrit, on nano-thermite in the WTC dust ( english subtitles ) in this video
DeltaPhi79 (3 weeks ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
So do we have some photos and actual results other than this guy's word?
soliv27 (3 weeks ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
what do you want more, do you want he send you a sample to smell it, put it on your tongue and you would say, yeah, that's thermite, and good one, nano-thermite from WTC I presume.
What do you need do believe it, you need Georges Bush himself to say yes he is right, that study is above reproach, or maybe if it was on fox news... ?
What photo do you want, the WTC7 fallin has no sense to you, what for a picture ?
what would you need to believe it was a controlled demolition ?
soliv27 (3 weeks ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Whatever, unless it comes from official services like FBI or CIA, you could doubt about where the dust comes from, who took it...
I think that if you really want to know and you need more than this man's word, you can read the scientific report, it explains precisely what they found, the fact that it comes from nanotechnology, and cannot be homemade, only military or big chemist ent can make it.
Talking with skeptics like you is more and more like talking with muslims about god.
DeltaPhi79 (3 weeks ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Probably because there's no solid proof from anyone. SOLID proof. I'm done with you.

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.