Watch this video in a new window

GEET Water Fuel Plasma Reactor Chamber Explained Part 2

Paul Pantone's GEET Device Explained in Full Detail. For everyone that doesn't understand that this is a fine tuned device. Just because some people failed building it, doesn't mean there hasn't be...  
 
Customize

More From: sirHOAX

Loading...

QuickList(0)

Upgrade to Flash Player 10 for improved playback performance. Upgrade Now or get more info.
54 ratings
Sign in to rate
49,430 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (0)

This video has no Responses. Be the first to Post a Video Response.
Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (20)   Options

Loading...
narivasant (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
I built this and it works. A fellow experimenter Leo Umila put one on a turbo diesel and he is getting 4X the mileage. My friend Mike in the USA put a sight glass on the end on his GEET and he can see a blue plasma glow around the rod while it is running.

see more about it here:

flickr. com/photos/37257699@N03/

and here:

tech.groups.yahoo. com/group/VortexHeatExchanger
OverUnityNow1 (2 months ago) Show Hide
 -4
Marked as spam
What a joke....
sirHOAX (2 months ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
Its possible he is creating a superheated steam on the fly which rusts out the inner rod due to oxidation. Leave the oxygen ridding the hydrogen. Hate to say this has to be built correctly to say if its real or not. A lot have not built it correctly. Iron may have impurities.

Just my 2cents. There are hydrogen on demand this way with superheated steam. Very early patents. Not sure why they never were adopted? Ya got me.

Need a lot of iron, maybe? Plates need to be agitated? Knock rust loose?
sirHOAX (2 months ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
Unless his electromagnetic is possible. Someone has to measure the rod for electricity. If it doesn't come up a polarity atleast then the concept of electromagnetic could be false. Then the iron oxide could be the only culprit. Burning urine is what he proposed, the DOT doesn't take lightly to people catching on fermenting their piss for fuel. Guy probably did sound like a 'nutter' in the court of law in the mid-west. -hah-

Run my car on water+pee? Does sound crazy. So does water for fuel.
OverUnityNow1 (2 months ago) Show Hide
 -2
Marked as spam
Are you willing to fill in for Paul pantone challenge?
sirHOAX (2 months ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
But we know H2O is in our urine, which can be electrolyzed to H+O and leave the impurities. So who is to be the judge.

Still think a lot of these patent holders for water for fuel are with-holding information. Regardless. Even someone looking for funding may still hold the key part of any patent.

Its that simple in the end. People may know, unwilling not coming forward. Its rather easy to state this could be the case.

As in SMeyer stating 'non-combustible-gases' or 'inert' ?? His terms.
sirHOAX (2 months ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
Also there are companies that hold hydrogen purifiers. They are a permeable surface made of a alloy. Heated to a certain temperature the hydrogen will break the barrier. The oxygen stays on the other side of the wall or tube.

These things exist. All you have to do is create the hydrogen and split it off pure. Its rather simple just no one has issued the proper energy source. Need 1kW min. for the small reactor.

They are on the market now and work as stated.
OverUnityNow1 (2 months ago) Show Hide
 -1
Marked as spam
Please do a experiment with a geet system, I have chanllenge GEETs. Look at my videos...
narivasant (1 year ago)
Comment removed by author
variablestatus (1 year ago) Show Hide
 -1
Marked as spam
thanks for the detailed info and great comments from your other viewers. 5*'s

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.