Tennis Muster vs Chang 1995 highlights (1/2)

whos is better? Muster or Nadal? not sure if nadal can handle the old school shorts and the old school racquets...

word

Chang hat aber im 1. satz 5:2 geführt. deshalb die starke anfangsphase

However much I lover Muster, he had absolutely NO variety whatsoever.
He had legs and a powerfull topspinned forehand, and that's it. He would just overpower his opponent grinding his way inside the court.
Nadal plays the same tennis, but adds dropshots, sliced shot etc.. Unfortunately, he's WAY better in all matter than Muster.
Besides, Muster very nearly always lost against net players (Edberg, Stich etc..) even on clay. But those are gone today, so it would maka no difference.

Jesus Christ, I remember how much of a MONSTER Muster was on clay...NO ONE wanted to play him on dirt. And in his hey-day, I wouldve put my money on Muster over the present day Nadal.

I think Bjorn Borg would have easily beaten both...

No, prime Nadal would have never lost to Stich on clay. Plus Federer on clay is better than anyone Muster beat at the French.

Chang played good here. and the video is good u can actually see the ball. nice. how did u record this?

Musterminator! Le Nadal autrichien!

mouais, même un nadalator a un jeu bien plus varié que ça...