Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

Marat Safin vs Pete Sampras US Open 2000

US Open final 2000: Marat Safin defeats Pete Sampras 6-4 6-3 6-3 song: Vangelis-Chariots Of Fire  
 
Customize

More From: bibiliotina

Loading...

QuickList(0)

Featured Videos

185 ratings
Sign in to rate
118,691 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Download This Song:
Advertisement

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (0)

This video has no Responses. Be the first to Post a Video Response.
Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (216)   Options

Loading...
ivankinsman (1 week ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Safin's problem was always consistency. He could play great and he could play appallingly. I always remember the matches against Federer where Federer's greater accuracy always took MS apart.
hishamabdulsamad (1 week ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
SAFIN : the best there is , the best there was and the best there ever will be . we will miss you.
ytorrejone (1 week ago) Show Hide
+2
Marked as spam
Just back after watching Safin play his last competitive match against Del Potro in Paris.Great atmosphere.A loss to tennis no doubt.
TomatoBasil23 (2 weeks ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Pete Sampras, always knew how to be gracious in defeat
gabe228 (1 week ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
except when losing to rafter
SeanMcGibbon (2 weeks ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Crystalamp... I don't think I've ever heard Pete Sampras' game described as "one dimensional" =) I think that's insane...
crystalamp (2 weeks ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Not so crazy if you realize he is really a serve and volleyer with a super human serve. Never really have the ability to break serve consistently, when he was a step slower, he was a sitting duck everybody who can get the serve back. The same dramatic declined marked Rafter's career as well.
SeanMcGibbon (2 weeks ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
I'm going to see him play a match with Todd Martin this weekend...
olivertruswell (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
They used that cliche when Nadal beat Federer at Wimbledon a year ago. He came back from illness, won a few Grand Slams and became No.1 again. Means nothing. A loss is a loss.
ihateuutube (1 month ago) Show Hide
+1
Marked as spam
It's a shame he lost the peak of his career to injury.

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.