BBC: Cosmology's Biggest Sceptic - Most of Our Universe is Missing

Cosmology is close to religion? It is the same as if you say art is close to religion. Some artists draw pictures with religious contents - that does not say anything about art.

Modern cosmology makes in most cases perfect mathematical sense. If you do not believe that nature is depending on the rules of mathematics then you can abandon all of physics. And think of the story of the atom: We were able to proof the existance of atoms a long time before we could actually see them.

It's so hard to believe that we are alone in this universe. I believe in God but I think there are some creatures outside our galaxy. And of course they don't look as weird as Hollywood filmakers show

"the illusion of knowledge", that's grand, kinda like asking where did the big bang start? If everything were spreading out from some single point seems it would be easy to retrace the trajectories back to the start, and important to say we know where it happened, yet no one ever says.

@Jammieg001 yes they do, but it's not anyone elses fault that you did not try and become aware of it. anyway just go spend a little time on wikipedia this topic has been beaten to death

Good video what he says makes a lot of sense physics is in a mess

My opinion is that the standard cosmology and also the alternatives I read about, didnt explain nature in a scientific integer way, 12/2009

BLANIK!! I LOVE FLYING BLANIK!! :)

If something is not there, you can make the decision that its not existing. I dont understand why one should bring up bizarre fantasies, when there is no reason for it. The entire discussion whether there is a god or not is meaningless. Unless he's popping up saying hello, we should go on with what we can measure. Zeus, Apollo, God or whatever you might name those imaginary figures are simply not there. This is a matter of fact and not worth a debate.

VERY VERY VERY WELL PUT MY FRIEND !

No, vindarm. "Burden of proof" is primarily a legal concept, extended to rational discussion.

There is no "burden of proof" on the theory of evolution. That idea is ridiculous. The theory of evolution - being science - is based on the factual evidence!