Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

Otomo Yoshihide guitar solo Tokyo 1994

P3, Tokyo 23.12.94  
 
Customize

More From: exciar28

Loading...

QuickList(0)

263 ratings
Sign in to rate
63,953 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (0)

This video has no Responses. Be the first to Post a Video Response.
Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (320)   Options

Loading...
tshhtf (2 weeks ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Excellent playing, thanks for the vid
jeffbeck147087 (3 weeks ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
This guy just blows me away, where does music like this take place?
senselessstudios (2 weeks ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
all over the place. possibly in your city as well.
Petfal (3 weeks ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Nice!!!
freejazzfree (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
some of the parameters of this piece are..
the guitar, the tuning, the effects (possibly harmonizer?) the physicality of attack.
there is sometimes a verticality in terms of seperation of registers.. the open sound of the guitar vs the higher almost altissimo-like screaming .. and obvious overtone series manipulation.
there is order in this piece.. there are a limited number of compositional devices he's working with here. the result may be unpleasing to your ear but there is method in this.
freejazzfree (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
sound is the basis of music. just because we've imposed order on sound doesnt make it any more or less appealing. essentially music is the conduit to the experience of sound.
and thats besides the point.. there is order and composition in this clip. just because it isnt fixed to a 12 tone tempered grid doesnt make it any less or more musical. interpretation and appreciation is subjective and very individualistic. this is very much music.
freejazzfree (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
sound is not bound by something like language.
it is much more anomalous in nature.
it does not require syntax or associations to be understood. a sound is a sound regardless of its associations or context.
beauty is an affirmation of being..
the excellence/essence of truth and originality.
NUM8ANDY (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
I guess we're talking about two different perspectives. You're right. Sound only has physical parameters (frequency, amplitude, volume, etc.) and does not require syntax or context. Of course there is beauty in sound. But music must have parameters/rules/order so that it can be interpreted by the listener, same as language. Otherwise everyone's "interpretation" will be different and not what the "musician" wants to convey. You are talking about sound, I am talking about music.This is not music.
freejazzfree (1 month ago) Show Hide
+1
Marked as spam
there is order in sound. there is order outside the parameters of our chosen methods of 'control'. order is all pervasive. just because we impose an 'order' on sound it doesnt mean sound has its own. and even in this case with otomo... there is clearly order in terms of physical execution, his choice of sound generation and even timbral/tonal areas.
the thing is.. breaking this down in such an intellectual manner is funny.. because the visceral appeal of this music is the key.
freejazzfree (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
you are clearly confused.
if you dont like what you hear... theres no point in debating this.
text is symbolic.. sound is not symbolic. music does not have any general or absolute rules. in order to achieve a specific effect one needs to understand the form of a particular idiom. not everyone wants to paint by numbers though.
nothing is wrong here.
everyone is attuned to different vibrations in different ways.
your absolutism is ridiculous and fascistic.

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.