[CHINA destroy a TIBET Monastery]チベット最大の寺院、中国武装警察の主導で破壊される映像

The very fact that they are destroying a Buddhist monastery tells you everything you need to know about the evil Chinese regime. China is simply a brutal, evil dictatorship - period!!!!!!!

SAVE Tibet From China !

This must be the one of the thousands of monastery they destroyed and looted. Stop the genocide and stop the occupation of tibet. Atheist chinese don't belong in Tibet's holy land........

China out of tibet now

"Our beautiful world is facing many crises.... It is not a time to pretend everything´s good." The Dalai Lama

you are wayyyy too one sided

U are just another ignorant pig who grew up under the influence of western media.. i admire your questioning spirit, but you are simply to lousy to pick out the right information from wrongs. It is not important to understand whether tibet WAS part of china or not, it is important to understand that there is a dissatisfaction going on in the region and they use tibet is not part of China as part of their reason/excuse/bargaining chip.

Sadly many people in the West are brainwashed and think the evil communist party is doing an OK job in China, but they don't know much about Falun Gong, East Turkestan or Tibet.

People & Power - The Lhasa Express - 08 Jun 08 - Part 1
watch?v=4gBm4IHhKTs

which is from perhaps the most credible source AlJazeeraEnglish shows a number of the issues in modern Tibet.

Pears Cyclopaedia was publishing proper Tibet maps up to 1953.

Tibetan words are very different to Chinese words. If Chinese had been living in Tibet in significant numbers before 1951 that would have changed.

Tibet is an invaded and occupied country.

so what gives Pear Cyclopedia the right to determine if an region has sovereign when the UN doesn't even do. so u are also saying that a country must also have a same language (i really laugh at this one). tibet Was not INVADED, (simply misuse of word), the chinese went in to help overthrowing the corrupted power group (u no they had slaves in tibet back then right?) by your definition, new mexico and texas should have more rights to declare independence than tibet

Tibet had its own language, culture, stamps, currency and passports. Sounds like a country to me.

There were no serfs or slaves in Tibet in 1948. The Tibetan government in India is democratic.

FREE all one party states