Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

Incendio Smyrne

The burning of Smyrna 1922  
 
Customize

More From: amanyala

Loading...

QuickList(0)

74 ratings
Sign in to rate
11,774 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (0)

This video has no Responses. Be the first to Post a Video Response.
Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (184)   Options

Loading...
Vasilis719 (2 months ago) Show Hide
 -1
Marked as spam
While I have challenged you with undisputable(and that's clearly why) documentation, and plain logic on this issue..you never ONCE have been able to dispute with any logic or legitimate proof within ANY context of this debate. Why?..because as is your history..it's the nature of the turk to be violent, leech off of superior races(as he find any vulnerability to exploit), and never creates. It ALL fits in a perfect profile of the turkish race..with all it's consistancies. TRULLY..END OF STORY
Vasilis719 (2 months ago) Show Hide
 -1
Marked as spam
Also, Christomos was handed over to a turkish mob by the turkish governer, and they proceded to rip his eyes out, tear his bodt to pieces, and drag him through the streets..in typical, savage, barbaric, turkish behavior. A turk told a story about how even as they were attacking and dragging him, he was crossing them(I don't know where he found the patience) asking God to forgive them for their actions. You want to talk about Orthodox religious duty?!!!!!. The same fate happened in Constantinople
Vasilis719 (2 months ago) Show Hide
 -1
Marked as spam
As you have seen..I'm quite informed on every detail of this issue..and running in crircles will not buy you any time, since I obviously can and do corner you mercilessly in this debate. Your out of your league..and I'm MORE than happy to keep proving it to you..LOL.
Vasilis719 (2 months ago) Show Hide
 -1
Marked as spam
They armed turks with the agenda of fighting off the victorious Greeks, who had a wall from north to south, to just outside ankara. They had a personal agenda..I don't think for a SECOND they actually supported you as a people..yet I also don't think they ever could have imagined what barbarism was to come from the turks. Whether arms were bought(with OUR tax money) or givin..it was for THEIR benefit..which gave turks a nation.
Vasilis719 (2 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
The north of Cyprus was 82% Greek..the turks attacked and claimed the north as part of turkey, occupying 35-40% of the island, with an 18% turkish minority!!!!. They ignored the UN, took even MORE land then they asked for..and attacked an unarmed Greek population(not a Greek ARMY!!)..and since the 50's had been encouraged(and armed) by the British to make claims on Cyprus(a Greek island), which resulted in the proven false propaganda of the turkish government..and the pogroms of 1955. THE END
Vasilis719 (2 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
LOL..muslims heard speeches giving in a church?.."Christomos" was a political leader?LOL..burning our people was a "religious" duty?LOL..Greeks planned to torch their OWN people and leave them to burn, as did the Armenians?!!!!. muslim neighbourhoods were spared?..for WHAT benefit?!!!!..and AGAIN I ask you, WHO was flooding the harbor with screaming babies?..THE CHRISTIANS!!. The "black hearts" are those of your jihadist muslim barbarians who leeched off of us for 400 years, instead of creating!
Vasilis719 (2 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Oh, NO DOUBT the Greeks torched you!!!!:))..we had been blcoked from reinforcement, had the Italians, French, and Russians against us after they had armed and trained your dumb monkey brained people..and basically left us hanging. What were we supposed to do?..wait to die?!!!!. I guess ignorance must be trully bliss, since you avoid the facts mentioned above, and ACTUALLY think victory is being GIVIN an army against a people with no arms to fight back with.
Vasilis719 (2 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
See, this is what happens when you challenge a superior races intellect..you set yourself up for humiliation..LOL. I've shown you quotes of your OWN people, I've presented quotes from YOUR allies, and you STILL come back for more abuse..LOL. Unless denial and lack of porgress is an effort..your race is still the same worthless, lazt, brainless bunch of barbarians trying to do their best imitation of REAL Europeans..LOL. Your whole identity is trying to leech off of someone..like the EU..LOL.
Vasilis719 (2 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
So naturally they set their people on fire..who were in fact the OWNERS of those properties..interesting theory..LOL. Tourists?LOL..to see what?..what the turks have accomplised?LOL. That city was built by Greeks, it's industry was runned by Greeks, and if the turk was capable of doing those things on his on..he would have, instead of leeching offo of us for 400 years!!!!!. So tell me WHAT is their to see?LOL. Greeks were the ones driven to the harbor from the fire, so how is it turks weren't?
Vasilis719 (2 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Also(I hate repeating myslef), Armenian were under turkish rule..and naturally they wanted their freedom..what wasn't a possibility, was any kind of Armenian "gangs" to accomplish independance..and Armenians were VOLUNTEERS in the Russian army; pre communist revolution. The civilian population was of NO threat, unarmed, and consisted of women and children. The few Greeks(a few thousand) and Armenians left is laughable..and in many cases, the survivors of massacre took on turksih indentities.

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.