IL
Upload

Adaptation and Mitigation: Quiggin AARES talk, Part 1 of 4

John Quiggin John Quiggin·6 videos
4
503 views
Like     Dislike 0

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to like John Quiggin's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to dislike John Quiggin's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to add John Quiggin's video to your playlist.

Uploaded on May 30, 2008

Presentation to AARES Symposium, Adelaide 23 May 2008

  • Category

  • License

    Standard YouTube License

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

The interactive transcript could not be loaded.

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Ratings have been disabled for this video.
Rating is available when the video has been rented.
This feature is not available right now. Please try again later.

All Comments (2)

Sign in now to post a comment!
  • PhotonDrive

    John: This is the main inventor of Fuel-Less Transport here. The reason for "Volitility" in both Gov. & Private financial charts, is that the UNDERLYING BASIS of energy use is UNCERTAIN. The great depression was caused by a switch from ELECTRICAL to MECHANICAL energy-base. Hoover/Ford went "car" FDR went "Road". Now, Fuel-Less Transport is neither "Motor", nor "machine" - it is Magnetic/Electronic, or, as the French Renault people are saying "ambient" propulsion sustenence. Your chart is Garbage

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate PhotonDrive's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate PhotonDrive's comment.
  • PhotonDrive

    "Summerized 3 Laws of Thermodynamics" - "You can't win". You can't even break even". "And you can't leave the game"!

    - So if efficiency gets WORSE when more "Materialized"; shouldn't efficiency transcend the "efficiencies of matter" when it becomes de-materialized?

    - An example is the Atomic Bomb. Isn't there quite a bit of heat, light, WORK knocking down all those buildings?

    - See what I mean about "hard science" engineers being extremely naive in their thinking about physic "Laws"?

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate PhotonDrive's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate PhotonDrive's comment.
  • Loading comment...
Loading...
Loading...
Working...
Sign in to add this to Watch Later