"Keep your eye on that building, it'll be coming down soon."

Buildings have burned much hotter and for far longer than WTC7 and they didn't collapse. The physics don't lie, this was a controlled demolition.

hahahahahahahahaha

Even if the debris damaged WTC 7 it's impossible it will fall straight down just like that.

Tony: maybe it was inevitable that WTC7 would collapse. I will agree with you on that. HOWEVER, you must admit that WTC7 did not have to collapse as it did: at nearly the same instant and at free fall acceleration for 2.25 seconds or 25 meters. I defy you to find a building anything like WTC7 that collapsed in anything like the manner of WTC7. 25 meters of free fall means 25 meters of vertical support suddenly gone. Not weakened by fire: GONE! And from all over the base of the building.

They should have at least vacuumed the carpets first - yuck!

Note the ticker at 0:38 which reads,

'Poll: half of US blames Bush admin for 9/11.'

Yeah, the undeluded half.

Can ANYONE tell me why my search bar no longer works on you tube?It works everywhere else on the web. You Tube does not want to be contacted.

You dont know what your talking about! As a Civil & Structural Engineer steel buildings to NOT come down like these three WITHOUT controlled Dems. Its IMPOSSIBLE!!! 911 was done by terrorists, I AGREE!! Unforunately the all worked at the Whitehouse!!

Get ready for the NWO people!

Okay then, I'll admit WTC 7 is contreversial. However, the South Tower looked nothing like a controlled demo. If it was it would've fallen straight down. 3 seconds into the collapse, the top portion of the tower tilted at about a 20 degree angle. The North Tower had a damn hole going straight through the building and it gained damage from the collapse of the South. By the way, how many times have you heard of a Boeing 767 hitting a steel structure straight on? Not that often. Not insidejob

lol...it didn't fall STRAIGHT down because there was a plane in it...

Stop wasting your life watching nascar and start using your brain