Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

Joseph Stiglitz - "Market Fundamentalism Is Dead"

Complete video at: http://fora.tv/2008/10/20/N... Nobel Prize-winning economist Joseph Stiglitz criticizes American financial leadership in the run-up to the current economic crisis, and declares ...  
 
Customize

More From: ForaTv

5,349 views
3,255 views
14,236 views
5,152 views
3,474 views
29,023 views
2,625 views
4,245 views
3,602 views
41,131 views
2,272 views
9,291 views
1,665 views
2,070 views
7,248 views
8,978 views
3,779 views
4,747 views
6,346 views
7,054 views

QuickList(0)

Featured Videos

Upgrade to Flash Player 10 for improved playback performance. Upgrade Now or get more info.
This is a video response to The State vs the Markets - Mark Thirlwell
94 ratings
Sign in to rate
11,985 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (1)

Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (73)   Options

Loading...
szymonch (2 weeks ago) Show Hide
 -6
Marked as spam
philomonger (1 month ago) Show Hide
+3
Marked as spam
Government intervention in favor of corporations will be inevitable in a capitalist system. Government is supposed to regulate corporations to prevent corporate abuse. Instead, corporations will regulate government because it is in their financial interest to do so. This is called "regulatory capture" in a free market economy and is well-documented.
mockingbird83 (2 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Bring on Polanyi!
sysopkc (2 months ago) Show Hide
 -5
Marked as spam
Because anyone who thinks Government intervention is helpful in a free market economy needs their brains examined. Talk about not caring for the public! HAHAHA thats about the most naieve thing ive heard yet. The govt. is the KING of that, do you think deflating currency markets is "caring for the people?' Your either insane or delusional. Govt will KILL you! Dont buy that one? Go ask the Iraqi people how well Govt. looks after one's interest. Ha, boy that was a good one.
mockingbird83 (2 months ago) Show Hide
+2
Marked as spam
sysopkc - forget your nationalism for a moment and take a look at a globe next time you're near one and have a look for 'little' states called Norway, Sweden, FInland and Denmark. Some of THE most interventionist countries around and they're not running from their govt. The US just has some profound distrust of its own government for some reason which noone understands - maybe because you believe the slanted and contemporarily irrelevant govt rhetoric of a handful of men from a few centuries ago
sysopkc (2 months ago) Show Hide
 -6
Marked as spam
ReginaldCrates (2 months ago) Show Hide
+3
Marked as spam
stupid argument with regard to free markets and government intervention.. free markets dont care for the public and so to slander government intervention is truly silly!
sysopkc (2 months ago) Show Hide
 -5
Marked as spam
free markets ARE the public, you dont know what your talking about. Or you work for the Government, one or the other. Review a little history sir.
ReginaldCrates (2 months ago) Show Hide
+1
Marked as spam
you misunderstood. taking care of depositors of banks for example is done by government to protect to protect their investments. without intervention banks could easily gain high risk profiles because it is a favorable position for them to earn profits. when they do eventually tie up too much liquidity into long-term assets; no other deposit-taking institutions will help, they go crying to the central bank for liquidity provision (lender of last resort). without government the system fails...
sysopkc (2 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
well that is true, and you are correct, although I dare call that "intervention" due to the fact that the funds are predisposed for that purpose and accounted as such. The high risk profile idea, annd the central bank role under the fractional money multiplication system is where the rub comes in with force. And the central banks arent government entities per se, but quasi-state institutions. I acknowledge your point however, you do have a position.

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.