Truth, Virtue, Goodness, Guns - A Philosophical Debate

Molyneux said that trees exist because they are bound together as atomic forces and forests don't exist because they generally are not linked together physically. (If a forest is only GENERALLY not linked together physically, doesn't that mean sometimes it is linked together physically?) If a tree exists due to the fact that it is an aggregation of molecules, why wouldn't a forest exist also? Because it has oxygen molecules in between each tree? It's still an aggregation of molecules.

qtronman could have done a far better job at arguing for an objectivist society. He doesn't even know how to finance a government without taxation! Trust funds, Donations, Immigration fees, Court fees, Nationalized gambling sector are all moral ways of financing a government. I want a real debate!

I have to say, self-defense is maybe your weakest point. Granted if the whole world was libertarian and enlightened then there may be no need for a standing army for the purpose of national defense. But even if we manage to create the kind of system you're advocating here in the U.S. for example, China isn't going to cease to be a dictatorship anytime soon is it? How will DROs defend themselves against MIGs and tanks and subs and naval artillery? sorry I just don't see it

wow, poor fellow on the left got slaughtered

This is awesome!

Both these guys are very bad at rational thinking, and coherent debating.