BBC Radio - Drills Ran on day of london bombings 7-7-05

He's actually directing his message to the 1000 or so employees of the company he worked in conjuction with on the day: "I'm a person of authority. I'm saying it was a coincidence. Do not question the official version of events"

its clear to me that the odds of this happening are astronomically small. whats also seems clear to me to me is that the real reason Peter Power is bringing attention to this implausible coincidence on air is to pre-empt the news being broken by one of the 1000 or so employees of the company he worked in conjunction with on the day. It's noticable how he keeps refering to them during the interview - even saying at one point "if their listening.."

i'm going to make this cunt pay if its the last thing i do

The Tavistock Institute was really showing off its power and influence by moving bus 30 to Tavistock Place/Square before blowing it up. A clear message to those in the know that they were the perpetrators. The enquiry is total bullshit. The whole incident whitewashed! Was it really to get Blair votes? Or is it, as some have suggested, simply about having the power to do it, and exercising that power for amusement! After all they didnt have to do it...did they?

Snaed27; prove the assertion you make that 'most of the injured..were actrs'.

Wake Up ...we are under attack from the inside ...I want Peter Power to be waterboarded to tell the truth ,who were his clients ????
A thousand people involved ? yet no one living in London told what was going on ?
try holding a street party and see the loops you have to jump through to get permission .....most of the injered on camera were actors in place ....

i don't get it. the goverment said that attacks on london were going to happen, they have prepared for it. It was common knowledge, even the BNP said that it would be an Asylum seekers and 2nd generation muslims. What's your point?

Just to add to that, apparently they found them they had been misfiled in 2002 instead of 2001.

Harhar, so they filed the record in next years archives by mistake, who has archives for 2002 in 2001?

For a start, a false flag attack of this type is to manufacture public consent for legislation designed to "protect national security" that erodes civil liberties, and justifies increasing government control and surveillance, by "proving" that the country is being targeted by "terrorists".