Watch this video in a new window

Seaplane Fighters No Runways to be Destroyed dynmicpara

Seaplane fighters that can take-off and land from the water that covers over 70% of the earth's surface cannot be denied flight by cratering a runway--an excellent point brought out by this video o...  
 
Customize

More From: dynmicpara

Loading...

QuickList(0)

Upgrade to Flash Player 10 for improved playback performance. Upgrade Now or get more info.
18 ratings
Sign in to rate
15,199 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (1)

Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (7)   Options

Loading...
stryker65 (1 year ago) Show Hide
+1
Marked as spam
Some issues i might have with this design 1) Up to what sea conditions can it be used ie. take off and land. 2) How much ordnance can one cram into a plane like this? 3) Visibility, won't the pilots rear view be obstructed by those intakes? 4) Won't the plane's hydrodynamics affect the plane's aerodynamic and stealth profile. 5) Logistics. Won't the ship carrying this be more have to be bigger to accommodate the plane's ordnance and fuel thereby becoming more vulnerable?
dynmicpara (1 year ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
Sea State 3 and above for water landings using the "C" technique. Go to the seaplanefighters web page offered in the video description
dynmicpara (1 year ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
Our surface ships already carry fuel and armaments for slow, short-ranged helicopters compromising their protection...its moot point...better to have a fixed-wing seaplane fighter that can actually defeat air/sea/land threats before they get close
dynmicpara (1 year ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
Stealth and pilot visibility are DESIGN features up to the creativity of the people making the seaplane fighter to include; the unimaginative need not try
dynmicpara (1 year ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
A fixed-wing sea airplane is more efficient than a helicopter and potentially can carry far more fuel and ordnance
flamesholder (4 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
4) stealth? in the 50's??

I think that all in all this plane is very interesting and worth attention.
WTR1982 (2 years ago) Show Hide
+1
Marked as spam
"Claiming to be the first jet-fighter seaplane". Silly yanks, we know the SR.A/1 was first, now.
BlacktailFA (2 years ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
If you put an FCS into a Seadart that could handle the AIM-120 AMRAAM and AGM-84 Harpoon, you've really got something. GPS-guided bombs and JASSM cruise missiles would also be handy, as the FCS itself isn't a factor in their use.

I could see that older SaRoe design dishing out Sidewinders and Hellfires, too.
BlacktailFA (2 years ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
The "Ski-Boat" you refer to is better known as a Hydrofoil.
The US Navy developed a Hydrofoil Missile Boat, known as the Pegasus-class, back in the late '60's. It was nothing more than a pile of over-expensive mental gadgetry, built for $PORK$, and over 30 years to build a measly 6 --- all were disposed of by 1995.
dynmicpara (2 years ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
He might have been trying to mock the seaplane fighter concept which is still important, valid and needed TODAY. Its through testing that feasible ideas are perfected.

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.