Hood vs Bismark

'Had not the power' really?,Tirpitz was the one hiding and avoiding ship to ship engagement and for good reason it didn't want to go the way of the Bismarck .

en serio... hay marik como asi

prinz eugen was cruiser that saw little combat maybe earned 3 battle stars unlike fighting cruiser such as USS San Francisco or Minneapolis which earned 17 battlestars all in the pacific where greatest naval battles in history took place. One torpedo in prinz eugen and stern fell off.

don't you have something to do with your life than fucking up others nerves on youtube

Bismarck smashed the pride of the British Navy within minutes. This was the right answer for bombing unguilty childs and women in German Cities.

Cyber, why don't you try that again but in English this time please.

cyber ever hear of final solution, zyklon B, waffen ss, bombing of spanish city Guernica when germany was not at war. typical neo nazi bismarck fanatic, your info the brits smashed the bismarck and rest of kriegsmarine, scharnhorst, graf spee, tirpitz, etc, etc,

@jers59
Buy a Toyota and cruise in Harlem.

Tirpitz?

The Britains tried to destroy it for years - but they always failed. The Tirpitz was first destroyed when the ship didn't fulfill any function anymore. The war was almost over and the ship was not destroyed on a ship-to-ship-battle (Britain couldn't, had not the power) but in "natural habour" close to Tromso. The ship was not protected anymore and damaged. It didn't sink 4.000 m but 3,50m. Slightly different to the Hood, isn't it?

The brits sent battlership to destroy the tirpitz but tirpitz would not put to sea and do battle ala graf spee, US sent BB USS Washington to atlantic to destroy the tirpitz again tirpitz would not sail to do battle. News for you the brits destroyed the worthless tirpitz that only fired her guns at weather station