pt 12 Archaeology and the Bible (full-length)

No archaeological discovery has ever controverted a biblical reference. (McDowell, Evidence that Demands a Verdict).

The Bible can be trusted. If people say it can't be trusted, they can just add any book such as the Book of Mormon or the Apocrypha or Quran to canon of scripture calling it God's Word. Very dangerous.

The Bible tells us when God used prophets to reveal new info about Himself. Luke 16:16, Matt 11:13, Heb 1:1

LHVM is reaching. It will never truly know the nature of God, nor will God recognize their baptism.

Jericho of the Bible ---> yeah, find that!

Can anyone here say Archeology Envy.

So it's saying that since there is little archeological evidence for the bible, we should give it the same weight as we do the Book of Mormon?
As a non-believer of both, I have no problem with this.
I think it becomes a little dishonest at the end however. While there is a bit of guessing in archeology, the great majority of archeological evidence is very scientific, and theories of archeology can be just as strong as theories in biology, physics, etc. He's definitely not an archeologist.

I read that information about the House of David. there is NO proof that David even existed. The only written evidence of David is from the Bible and maybe someone years after his death.

Interesting!