Design for a hotel in Wellington, New Zealand using algorithmic architecture generated in Max Script. Music by mogwai, 'I know you are but what am I'.
Portfolio: http://www.nzarchitecture.com
Bart ...
Like to rate videos and let people know what you think?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Like to share videos with friends?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
This video has been removed from your Favorites. (Undo)
Like to Favorite videos and let people know what you think?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
this is no more radical (or absurd) that the modernist aproach, only with more compute potential, and we all know the modern consequences of that "tomorrow that never came" (matter acumulation, energy waste, modern ruins, overcrowding...). the computer power i think is on the capacity to understand the material world, to make more with less, zero impact, reversibility, lightness, to left some room for the people for the future. i hope this messege get to you. cheers from Chile -n.ortiz
ok so let's take the facts: 1 - more than half of the architects and urban planners are located in the Europe and North America which count only for 15-20% of the global population; 2 - considering the growth prediction, as compared to the rate of training of new designers is it realistic that we can always have the necessary human resources to plan new cities? For this reasons I think that having a program can design a city might be useful in the near future.
I was about to trash this video, but then I read the conclusion, and I couldn't agree more.
Stupid people would use this kind of programming just because it looks cool and does everything by itself, without even thinking about the best solution. It's like the infite monkey theory.
I also think that this kind of architecture should not be of mainstream knowledge for the very reason I just said.
Machines are meant to be used by a brain, and not the other way. Anybody else agrees?
Yea I really like his book, Machining Architecture, particularly when he talks of these methods as being the architecture of the provisional rather than optimal.
Some other references I always come back to: Manuel De Landa, Deleuze and the Use of the Genetic Algorithm in Architecture
Neil Leach, Digital Morphogenesis (In AD 79, 1, 2009)
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
(it looks like you could do some code refactoring)
1 - more than half of the architects and urban planners are located in the Europe and North America which count only for 15-20% of the global population;
2 - considering the growth prediction, as compared to the rate of training of new designers is it realistic that we can always have the necessary human resources to plan new cities?
For this reasons I think that having a program can design a city might be useful in the near future.
Stupid people would use this kind of programming just because it looks cool and does everything by itself, without even thinking about the best solution. It's like the infite monkey theory.
I also think that this kind of architecture should not be of mainstream knowledge for the very reason I just said.
Machines are meant to be used by a brain, and not the other way. Anybody else agrees?
Some other references I always come back to:
Manuel De Landa, Deleuze and the Use of the Genetic Algorithm in Architecture
Neil Leach, Digital Morphogenesis (In AD 79, 1, 2009)
Kostas Terzidis, Algorithmic Architecture
John Frazer, An evolutionary Architecture
Feel free to add comment with your own favorites.