Good science versus bad science
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Uploaded on Oct 23, 2008
In order to get the public on our side, we need to use the scientific as well as the moral argument against animal experiments.
The moral and the scientific argument complement each other very powerfully.
The moral argument is best conveyed by images of animals used in experiments.
Animal experiments represent one of the most grotesque of blunders in medical history – let us get rid of them and replace them with good science. Good science should be species specific, should do no harm and be evidence based.
With the ending of animal experimentation, a great evil will be lifted from the earth, which will have untold and far-reaching benefits for health and the life on this planet.
For more info. go to http://www.animal-tv.org/E
-
Category
-
License
Standard YouTube License
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
-
46:40
Science For Smart Peopleby FatHeadMovieFeatured
92,625
-
3:59
Good science versus bad science (short version)by animallog
1,823 views
-
4:22
תרנגולת כפי שמעולם לא ראיתם - וידאו מדהים ומרגש!by animallog
647 views
-
3:14
Dr Andre Menache about the experiments in Weizmann Instituteby animallog
2,860 views
-
1:30
הכנסו לאתר Go To Animal-TV. orgby animallog
570 views
-
8:26
Bad Science: Darwin and evolutionby 101011001
30,787 views
-
5:40
Wasted Lives: How are animals used?by AnimalAid
11,426 views
-
35:07
Bad Scienceby AgendaStevePaikin
963 views
-
10:27
Ben Goldacre Interview on Bad Science, Sensational Journalismby Conradq
4,869 views
-
6:02
Cliff Stoll: Good Scienceby ATTTechChannel
7,346 views
-
2:09
Animals in medical research: To use or not to use?by jackaristide
8,901 views
-
5:34
Why we use Animals in Medical Researchby speakingofresearch
25,413 views
-
1:51
Animal Moral?by ambra123
74,187 views
-
10:00
Bad Astronomy Vs Good Science: Debunking Phil Plaitby soupdragon42
17,031 views
-
5:05
A Short Documentary: Animal Testing Right or Wrong?by eyeoftime
9,513 views
-
10:01
Science and its Hypotheses (Philosophy of Science)by crazypills2
4,842 views
-
1:27:27
The Great Debate: THE STORYTELLING OF SCIENCE (OFFICIAL) - (Part 1/2)by ShirleyFilms
222,438 views
-
7:58
Facts Of Evolution: Good Design, Bad Designby Best0fScience
49,586 views
-
7:28
Expérimentation Animale, Un scientifique denonce 2/2by Veganius
2,822 views
-
3:05
Stop animal experimentation :WARNING: SHOCKING IMAGESby FrictionTV
10,872 views
- Loading more suggestions...
Video Responses
All Comments (351)
Patricia Zamy 6 months ago
Safer Medicines' stance is that a rational combination of human biology based technologies can provide more relevant and reliable information for humans than animal tests. Their ethical beliefs as I understand it, revolve around protection of humans.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
MarshalNey13 6 months ago
I glanced at the first link you sent. If i have time I'll look at the others.
If you read the "about us" section of safermedicines you'll see that they: "do not oppose animal testing per se". I have emailed them for additional clarification on their stance on animal experimentation and their ethical beliefs.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Patricia Zamy 6 months ago
Also look at antidote (dash)europe (dot)org for a really informative anti-vivisection website. The interviews with scientists were very interesting for me because I was unaware that science can currently be taught without vivisection. To think that when my daughter expressed an interest in science at uni... and I replied that she would have to deal with abominable vivisection! I was so wrong!....The interview with an Australian vet who campaigned for humane education and succeeded was inspiring.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Patricia Zamy 6 months ago
Dear ALL, it’s up to us now! It is only public opinion that can bring medical research into the 21st century because we the ordinary people care about our loved ones far more than we care about money. The ethical scientists are already there but need our support, please see how we can help at the website safermedicines org by writing to the MHRA and asking when the pharmaceutical companies will be required to use superior, human biology tests so that new medicines are as safe as possible. Thanks
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Patricia Zamy 6 months ago
There is a growing number of ethical scientists who want to protect human life by bringing medical research into the 21st century. They are currently campaigning to replace outdated and unreliable animal testing with new lab tests based on human biology which can offer greater protection to human volunteers during clinical trials. Please log on to safermedicines (dot) org
Another organization is: “Dr Hadwen Trust for Humane Research”
drhadwentrust (dot) org
Another is: antidote(dash)europe org
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Patricia Zamy 6 months ago
Millions of animals and humans are killed and maimed by a greedy industry which main goal is PROFITS. Adverse reactions kill 197000 Europeans annually, many more thousands are maimed by them.
Viewers who wish to have an insight into the huge conspiracy which currently exists in the development and production of medicines please see the report: “Making a Killing: How drug company greed harms people and animals” by logging into:
animalaid (dot) org (dot) uk/h/n/CAMPAIGNS/experiments//1902//
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Patricia Zamy 6 months ago
1. Log on to SaferMedicines org and call on the government to mandate the use of new technologies to ensure new medicines are as safe as possible.
2. Log on to drhadwentrust org which has funded innovative medical research projects that have helped both animals and humans.
3. Log on to antidote (dash) europe org and find out about their campaigns and interviews with antivivisection scientists, some who teach science without vivisection or have campaigned for humane research and succeeded.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
MarshalNey13 7 months ago
"growing number of...scientists" I interact with MDs and PhDs on a daily basis and I've never met one who believed animal research was useless. I've asked you numerous times to name names but you can't. You're fabricating the whole thing.
I'm training to be a doctor, not a pharma rep. If someone built a magic machine that could FULLY replace animal research I would welcome it. Housing animals is expensive and unpleasant.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Patricia Zamy 7 months ago
It is hard for you isn’t it MarshalNey?. Hard to even begin to admit that your studies and experience are already obsolete! That is why you arrogantly dismiss such a growing number of reputable, qualified and experienced scientists who are against vivisection, because to give any validity to their opinions would go against your own interests and would mean that your career has so far been an utter waste of time.The world is constantly changing and those who wish to stay in the past remain there.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube