Good science versus bad science

i could not pull myself to continue watching this bullshit past minute 4.. some other ignorant attempting pseudo-scientific discourse.. the horror, o pussycat!

theres is not good or bad science
do you think that you can fuck all the science history, this is not a sociology or moral class of highschool
you are a pendejo! man, you can eliminate one of the rules of science there is no moral, is ethical and thats diferent
im no saying that is good doing animal test they are living organism and are alive
im saying that you are a pendejo!

There is no good in vivisection. You might as well flip a coin for the results because research tested on animals are often dangerous and incorrect.

experimenting on animals would have been an option when we were dumb just a 100 or 150 or 200 years ago or w.e but now we know shit about genes DNA and crap so why do animal tests if we've already broken down the components of life? simple answer whats still happening is quicker. just like why we're only JUST
beginning to look into an alternative to gas engines. it was there it worked but now oh look at what we did. so lets move onto something that gets better results and is better for all!

the one point I need to make is. without animal testing we would not have artificial insulin, a medical marvel that saves an insane amount of lives each day.

Horny, it is said by experts that we could have arrived at that result without animal testing. And how do we explain the 140,000 people/year that die from drugs on the market that passed animal tests? I would be opposed to it even if it worked (cuz that is who I am) but I truly believe it is a failure.

didnt i?...hmm not to be rude but it seems like you can not infer anything out of what I wrote.

what were they?

you are not as smart as you make yourself seem.