Watch this video in a new window

Sviatoslav Richter plays Schumann Concerto in A minor Op. 54

Part I Robert Schumann, Piano Concerto in A minor, Op.54 1. Allegro affettuoso Recording 1958  
 
Customize

More From: truecrypt

Loading...

QuickList(0)

87 ratings
Sign in to rate
31,298 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (0)

This video has no Responses. Be the first to Post a Video Response.
Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (59)   Options

Loading...
stefthe80 (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
i think mozzart was tchaikovsky's favorite..but i get your point
headmark915 (1 month ago) Show Hide
+1
Marked as spam
Schumann's music touches and affects me like nothing else can. For me, he is the one.
woodstone61 (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
i agree !!
kalduglun (3 months ago) Show Hide
+1
Marked as spam
At 6:25 begins a passage that - to my opinion - strongly resembles for instance Rachmaninoff piano concertos style, especially the third one. But also perhaps Tchaikovsky, something from the russian school.
truecrypt (3 months ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
You picked up something obvious but not often mentioned... Schumann was Tchaikovsky's favorite! And Rachmaninoff used to say that "music has ended after Schumann and Tchaikovsky"! Strong musical/spiritual connections between these composers...
ilovefchopin (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
i strongly agree !
the first time i heard this concerto i thought it was by rachmaninoff, i never thought it was a work by schumann!
mario54671 (3 months ago) Show Hide
 -1
Marked as spam
Well, you shouldn't really change the tempo of any piece anyways, there's a reason why it's marked a certain tempo, because the composer wanted it that way, that's how you play his/her work. If you don't follow that tempo, then you're not playing the piece, now you're making up something else...
mltube (6 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
As good as it gets.
MJTTOMB (6 months ago) Show Hide
+3
Marked as spam
it's not his interpretation that gives it a clonky sound. it's the recording. this was recorded in 1958, before the dawn of effective microphone techniques. and argerich is a fantastic pianist. but really, richter is one of my favorite pianists, and to say that the inability of a recording engineer to do an effective job makes him any less brilliant of an interpreter is downright foolish..
SamuelFeinberg (8 months ago)
Comment removed by author

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.