katana vs .50 machine gun

I never thought that was possible...but now...I don't know what to believe
Too bad humans don't have fast reflexes to cut bullets with katana as we see in the movies.
Then you can say katana vs gun -- katana wins

the medievel can cut through chain and plate armor right?

wow impressive blade it cut a nice amount of bullets b4 givin way. love katana :D

@lava

You are in a bubble of idiocy. The federal reserve is subjected to the govt and the central bank. The govt controls the central bank of USA, and federal reserve works together with central bank.

Lava everything you state about the fed is complete error. Fed isnt the one who manipulates and causes the US dollar to fall.

The govt of US is the leader that causes the US dollar to fall. Look at the current recession. Bush failed to control monetary policy causing bankruptcy. Not the fed.

@kei

yet you people who love US talk so much upon other peoples criticism of US. But yet you of all people like chris ignore and neglect the fact US is also upon this irony you sought to defend of.

Calling me ironic is as much as calling yourself ironic.

@kei

Also i would have agreed full extent of using the bomb if it was used against Japanese military forces. But the bomb was aimed at people without weapons. And you can call that total justifiable?? In an extent no.

So i guess you even agree to the fact US used napalm burning people alive, or US malicously stealing from people like middle east?

@kei

so you think Americans use of atmoic bomb was justifiable?? You know before the Atomic bomb was dropped the president of US decided should it be used.

The US president had other plans for Japan, but the secretary general insisted on using it. USA hadnt even tested it yet. They dropped their first bomb on Japan and used it as a testing site.

Yes, it did save lives. American lives, as well as Russian lives, not to mention the lives of every single Japanese civilian, every one of which you know would have fought to the death.

It isn't ironic, yuna. You yourself admitted to it: Had the emperor not surrendered, more or less every single Japanese civilian - man, woman, or child - would have died fighting. In what way is that preferable?

The decision to use nuclear weapons was similar to the idea that you, "kill one, and save a thousand." In the end, less people died with the atomic bombs than if generic military force had been used.impossible to tell who was the enemy.

You yourself show a great deal of ignorance by saying that one retard you argue with on youtube represents all Americans, I thought the Japanese were a lot more honorable, disciplined, and  sharper than what you display in your writing. Where one idiot is other idiots will gather in his/her place. Remember that before you judge someone ego.