Womens 100m final from Barcelona

Her start from the blocks was phenomenal. Perfection. It got her ahead and kept her ahead despite Cuthbert's catching up. It was the start here that got her the win.

OTTEY= DRUG CHEAT!!!!

lets no forget veronica

I also believe that since Beejing american are busy in the lab,trying to develope new drugs to stop Bolt and the Jamaican girls.I would not be surprized next season ordinary atheletes start doing crazy times.

I can bet you one thing,if you put all those runners that use to beat Ottey at Olympics and worl championship to race her now,she would dismiss them with ease,why?they have stop using those drugs.its a fact ,hjust look at her at *Athens 200sS4 at 43.

Merlene was never cleared by IAAF, the charges were dismissed CAS, which is the governing body for sport, so in accordance to the rules - she would be aloud to compete in IAAF sanctioned events... because of the ruling.. it was the IAAF that brought the charges against her, after testing positive on 3 separate ocassions during the 1999 season. This case is directly responsible for the formation of WADDA.

Merlene didn't test positive on three ocassions. Where on earth did you get that from? For the record, Merlene's previous test in Stockholm was clear!

See look at all these ppl...the problem with bein accused of cheating in sports is...once you're accused of it all the sheep will follow without evidence in a pathetic attempt to discredit someone. She sprinted for over 20 yrs and has her whole career damaged because of an incident in one year. If the evidence was so solid..why hasn't she been stripped of all her medals/records like Marion Jones was ?? I bet you're gonna suggest now that the Jamaicans dominating currently are cheating too right?

Second of all she WAS cleared by the IAAF...and they came under criticism. Why are you hell bent on believing the lab that made the mistake and not Merlene? Answer that...you're telling me that there have never been several accounts in history where an organization wasn't willing to admit wrong doing even though they did?? If the lab said tomorrow that Merlene Ottey was also on heroine...you'd believe it without question or evidence because ur interest is nothing short of biased...

What proof do you have that she was dirty for years???? The problem with you is you seemed to be more obsessed with Merlene Ottey they person rather than the controversy itself..you're trying to downplay her when as late as 2000 at an Old age she was still competing at a young level. Your attempt to discredit that fact..and to ruin Merlene Ottey shows your intentions...for you and from your previous comments it's about ruining HER whether u hav solid evidence or not