Concorde landing at Kai Tak

cool...........

No it wouldn't Concorde wouldnt have crashed if the DC-10 that took off before hand had been maintained properly.
The metal strip on the runway that burst the tire has fuck all to do with Concorde's design

Of course it wouldn't! The DC-10 was the trigger of the AF4590 crash. The Concorde was inadequate in the way of bad tires and lack of protection of F.O.D.

But it was the inadequate maintenance of the aircraft that used the runway before that caused the accident essentially.

regarding inadequate or neglecting maintenance then the Concorde fails also, I referring to the spacer that the Concorde maintenances didn't reinstall.

tell you what dannepanne87, get yourself back to the boeing museum where these flying death tubes are dropping out of the sky "nearly" everyday, tell boeing to make their shit planes safe because concorde made them all look stupid and crap, BOEING = SHIT, CONCORDE = HISTORY. So hush up. Concorde crashed ONCE in how many years, now check how many boeings and people perished in that period, thanks, fuck off.

Maybe you should study Probability theory.

Of course. That was the primary cause. Every mishap is the consequence of a chain of events with a main cause and a number of contributing factors. Main cause: DC-10 (faulty maintenance) and the Concorde was responsible for the contributing factors which was inadequate design and also faulty maintenance) regarding F.O.D.

Unfortunately freak disasters wern't taken into account, where as in your world they are, in which they are all prevented, by magic.

Haha wonderful statement. Get some information.