YouTube home Comedy Week on YouTube
Upload

4 Degrees Warmer: Great Cities Wash Away

NationalGeographic NationalGeographic·4,194 videos
2,614,861
139,473
Like     Dislike 39

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to like NationalGeographic's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to dislike NationalGeographic's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to add NationalGeographic's video to your playlist.

Uploaded on Jan 30, 2008

If the world warms by four degrees oceans will rise and glaciers will disappear, cutting off fresh water to billions.

Six Degrees Could Change the World :
SUN FEBRUARY 10 8P et/9P pt : http://channel.nationalgeographic.com...

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

The interactive transcript could not be loaded.

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Ratings have been disabled for this video.
Rating is available when the video has been rented.
This feature is not available right now. Please try again later.

Top Comments

  • ReduceGHGs

    .

    I pretend to degbate the issue with you. Sorry. I'm really providing necessary information to those that lack it.

    You listed scientists, I found that they have questionalble motives. That apparently doesn't matter to you. Shy?

    Like you the moon landing deniers lack respected scientific evidence of their claims.

    News Flash.... Google: Stanford Scientist Criticizes Fox Distortion Of His Climate Study

    This is evidence of some of the denialism you have so much FAITH in.

    · 29

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate ReduceGHGs's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate ReduceGHGs's comment.
    in reply to FantasticBob7000 (Show the comment)
  • goog2k

    Average Global Temperatures SPIKED +0.6C (+1.08 degrees F) since 1975.

    Summer Arctic Sea Ice has dropped -50% since 1980.

    Since 1950 atmospheric CO2 has spiked +30% over highest levels in 400,000+ years.

    CO2 Ocean Acidification is up +30% since 1900!

    Oops?

    For more data & documented info. on Carbon Dioxide/CO2 Concentration, Global Surface Temperature, Arctic Sea Ice and Land Ice (Antarctica & Greenland) & Sea Levels

    Search: NASA Climate Change

    or go to:

    climate.nasa(dot)gov/keyIndica­tors

    · 23

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate goog2k's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate goog2k's comment.

Video Responses


All Comments (975)

Sign in now to post a comment!
  • ReduceGHGs

    Yea, I've read they were pretty conservative with their estimates. On sea levels they didn't even consider the ice shelve melt because there were too many unknowns. It's clear we're in deep doo doo. Now we can only mitigate the damages. To that end our policy makers in Congress need to hear us. Too many of them block progress to reduce global emissions. I've written many. Spread the word!

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate ReduceGHGs's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate ReduceGHGs's comment.
    in reply to AlternateSteve90 (Show the comment)
  • AlternateSteve90

    I've read it myself. There are a FEW things that the IPCC did in fact genuinely underestimate, Arctic ice being the one factor of significance, but other than that, they've actually been largely on target with everything else.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate AlternateSteve90's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate AlternateSteve90's comment.
    in reply to ReduceGHGs (Show the comment)
  • captainjack77

    The Ganges is fucking disgusting - good riddance.

    India has over 1 billion people. If we want to discuss biologic concerns, how about carrying capacity? Take a look at a chart of population growth from 1750 until now. Also, look at where the population boom is occurring. You're concerned about other critters, and creatures? Well guess what? These humans are out competing the animals for resources. Overpopulation is the big concern. More people = more hydrocarbon usage.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate captainjack77's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate captainjack77's comment.
  • Brandon Thies

    the World Bank Predicts this will happen by 2100

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Brandon Thies's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Brandon Thies's comment.
  • ReduceGHGs

    Read up. This was published today. I'm sure you'll look hard to find reasons why they would lie.

    .

    Google: Report: IPCC Underestimates Climate Risks

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate ReduceGHGs's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate ReduceGHGs's comment.
    in reply to Fridaey13txhOktober (Show the comment)
  • ReduceGHGs

    Yes, it is "claimed" that we rotate around the sun. If you CHOOSE not to believe it, that of course is your prerogative. From your perspective perhaps the only honest science out there is that which comes from the fossil fuel industry? Those that will profit from delaying the shift to cleaner alternatives?

    Too transparent. You scam yourself by not thinking critically about this issue.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate ReduceGHGs's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate ReduceGHGs's comment.
    in reply to Fridaey13txhOktober (Show the comment)
  • Fridaey13txhOktober

    Of course it is claimed they are cleared, the devil is in the detail as the expression goes.

    I am not particulary religious but indeed, I would think there is honest research going, behind the carbon footprint scams, the powers that be are probably concerned by now.

    Hovewer, just as soviet archives where opened with the dissolution of the soviet state and communism, the current system needs to go before these researchs can emerge.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Fridaey13txhOktober's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Fridaey13txhOktober's comment.
    in reply to ReduceGHGs (Show the comment)
  • Loading comment...
Loading...
Advertisement
Loading...
Working...
Sign in to add this to Watch Later