http://www.mslaw.edu
Dr. Kenneth Miller uses Dr. Beatty's very own example of a mouse trap to prove why he thinks the central idea of intelligent design, irreducible complexity, is wrong.
Kurt Ol...
http://www.mslaw.edu Dr. Kenneth Miller uses Dr. Beatty's very own example of a mouse trap to prove why he thinks the central idea of intelligent design, irreducible complexity, is wrong.
Kurt Olson interviews Dr. Barbara Forrest, David K. DeWolf and Dr. Kenneth R. Miller in this episode of Massachusetts Educational Forum:Educational Forum: Evolution and Intelligent Design: The Science, The Debate and the Legal Landscape.
The full interview is available at http://tinyurl.com/yts5nb . The Massachusetts School of Law also presents information on important current affairs to the general public in television and radio broadcasts, an intellectual journal, conferences, author appearances, blogs and books. For more information visit mslawledu.
Like to rate videos and let people know what you think?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Like to share videos with friends?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
wow xander70769 making an argument from ignorance makes you look like a tool. You are totally side stepping fact that irreducible complexity has NEVER been debunked for years. Get over it.
wow karamarouge, making an argument from ignorance makes you look like a tool. you are totally side-stepping the FACT that irreducible complexity has been COMPLETELY debunked for years. get over it.
befitting.. Another moron citing judicial rulings as though they have any bearing on truth or fact.
hey..let me get that court ruling about how black people are half human as so could be bought and sold like animals. After all its also in line with Darwins hypothesis on how the negro was the missing link, half ape inferior of the white man...
"this would be like a theist claiming a banana is proof of god...oh wait..."
No thats silly to say. The mousetrap is not proof of anything. Its an analogy made by Michael Behe concerning the functionality of biomolecular structures. Miller only uses it to show why Behe is wrong. Its an analogy and not a proof or disproof. If you don´t have any knowledge about biochemistry, then of course iyou won´t understand what these guys talk about.
even though i know IC is a load of bull, and even though i usually respect what miller says, i find this mousetrap analogy to be somewhat silly and inneffective. this would be like a theist claiming a banana is proof of god...oh wait...
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
befitting.. Another moron citing judicial rulings as though they have any bearing on truth or fact.
hey..let me get that court ruling about how black people are half human as so could be bought and sold like animals. After all its also in line with Darwins hypothesis on how the negro was the missing link, half ape inferior of the white man...
Hm m? I am still waiting for an explanation of exactly what the flagellum was used for before the stator "randomly" evolved..
When you have that answer then feel free to come back and join the adult debate..
Until then you are just another fundamentalist neo darwinist looking quite stupid defending a rather pathetic ruse!
No thats silly to say. The mousetrap is not proof of anything. Its an analogy made by Michael Behe concerning the functionality of biomolecular structures. Miller only uses it to show why Behe is wrong. Its an analogy and not a proof or disproof. If you don´t have any knowledge about biochemistry, then of course iyou won´t understand what these guys talk about.
Type "Miller flagellum" on Youtube or copy that:
/watch?v=RQQ7ubVIqo4
Miller dodges nothing my friend, Behe dodges everything which you will figure out if you read the dover trial. This guy is not even worth mentioning.
"UNTIL YOU ADDRESS KEY COMPONENTS OF A FLAGELLUM"
Your caps lock is defect.
I did adress key components of the flagellum which you totally ignored....
THE FACT REMAINS YOU ARE DODGING THE FACT THAT MILLER COMPLETELY SKIPPED THE ENTIRE FLAGELLUM AND HIS ARGUMENT IS NOTHING BUT A RUSE.
UNTIL YOU ADDRESS KEY COMPONENTS OF A FLAGELLUM YOU SIRE ALONG WITH YOUR MILLER NONSENSE ARE NOTHING BUT ACADEMIC FRAUDS!