The Origin of Life - Abiogenesis - Dr. Jack Szostak

Extant

You ban me from your channel and then you start trying to engage me in debate on aronras video, dont ya think that is hypocritical?

You can't have it both ways Mr P

Every creationist should be forced to watch this and then explain it accurately to 10 others.
Hopefully after all that explaining and listening they might actually start using their brains.

I'm not holding my breath though.

Thing is, there are still people who profit from this confusion, saying that the term is universal without pointing out that different specialists use it in totally distinct ways, and the years when those terms arose in each field. These people that misinform and trick the christians are the ones that must be questioned first. I would start with the original venomfangx...
Any donor for his "charity" could sue him.

@dancingnature Very curious your coment (in a good way), seriously i haven't ever heard of cosmic evolution as is; i know about 150 astronomists that hate me because i have asked them if such term ever existed (allways heard negatives). Stellar evolution i have heard in the same way, refered to the latin term of "change" (evolvere, i believe) the word root, rather than have any ties with biology. Is legitimate but just too much colloquial, even in those cases.

junkyardPoopster

So-you want to censor me then ?

LOL

Bite me.

robert, how many bugs start out as larve and then grow wings? spinning silk is a natural advantage, like being able to build a house. try something hard like the transition from asexual to sexual reproduction. i'll be more than willing to shut you down.

The almost incredible fact that a caterpillar changes into butterfly a completely different creature able to fly ..why does it do this and how?..by what evolutionary process did this come about..and why ?what is the purpose? How could evolution possibly account for this amazing metamorphosis?

cosmic evolution is used by astronomers if they loosely refer to the universe and how it has changed since the big bang ..you are correct that this has not much to do with biological evolution...stellar evolution is used also to refer to the somewhat predictable stages in a stars life
&the evoluton of civilizations is a now discredited idea relating to how civilizations change- again, not much to do with living organisms
the term "evolution"is used legitimately in fields other than biology

*****************
puppetMattster @
*****************
++ A mutation PLUS natural selection yields new information. A harmful mutation would not be selected for, and in fact would be selected AGAINST very quickly through painful death! ++


Please note the following confirm your theory is dead. If I am wrong please give me the source.

(1) Natural selection adds zero to a cell.

(2) A mutation adds nothing novel to a cell.

This will come as a great surprise to you hummonkworld...SCIENCE HAS NO BELIEFS! If any scientist ever claimed a belief...he is NOT a Scientist!