judgment at nuremberg verdict

Morals can be viewed as "above earthly things", but please do not assert that non-religious people are incapable of holding them or simultaneously imply that all religious people have them. No matter if morals are earthly or divine; as long as we have them, we're on the right track. After all, the Golden Rule espoused by most religions says nothing about a divine mandate.

Nauticus grand is not saying atheists can't be Moral, He is saying Atheists can't give a good reason for being moral , big big diffrence , " Earthly morals" is just a smoke screen for atheists simply vote on whats moral and when they get control of goverment like Mao did, they don't have to worry about other voters anymore , but can decide for themselves, atheists like Mao reasoned that people who got in his way were disposable mammals, atheism has no resources to condemn Mao's earthly ethics

arent jewish people religious?

Yes, and therein likes the exception to my Holocaust denier rule. I'm sure you could have worked it out by yourself.

the nazies didnt strike me to be a very religous people either. Perhaps if they had the holocaust might not have happened.

The matter regarding the nature of American/free world principles" are still being decided. The question will be in doubt until the investigation of war crimes in Iraq.