Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

Richard Dawkins stumped by creationists' question?

Dawkins' response to Creationist bullshit (including the famous "stumped" video) at AAI '07. A more detailed response from Dawkins with regard to this video is as follows: "In September 1997, I al...  
 
Customize

More From: Eyedunno

Loading...

QuickList(0)

207 ratings
Sign in to rate
8,827 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (0)

This video has no Responses. Be the first to Post a Video Response.
Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (147)   Options

Loading...
Comment(s) marked as spam Show
gotank (1 month ago) Show Hide
+3
Marked as spam
Haha, I don't know why this comment was thumbed down so many times, but I had a good laugh! =)

Doesn't Dawkins' own opinion on the this matter at all?
MarcusCardiff (2 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
The science is interesting so fk off line was Dawkins quoting the editor of New Scientist magazine and from a completely different program altogether.
Metaleks (2 months ago) Show Hide
+2
Marked as spam
That's the thing. It wasn't a raw. It was a hoax...
Comment(s) marked as spam Show
goingtoeatpizza (2 months ago) Show Hide
+9
Marked as spam
BuckTurgidson01: Do you even understand the question?

Dawkins has answered it. He has written books on it and taught it for years at Oxford.

The question is a paradox, it basically means: "please explain how complex life can evolve from simple ancestors. The answer to that cannot be summed up with one example.

Its irrational to believe that someones inability to answer a flawed question raises doubts about their credibility. However, theres a lot of gullible people in the world.
Metaleks (2 months ago) Show Hide
+10
Marked as spam
Buck: First off, if I can answer the question, then Dawkins - a man who devoted his life to the subject - certainly can. Lets not belittle his intelligence.

Secondly, the stumped video is a hoax. I mean, you've watched this video, seen the other variations, heard Dawkin's opinion on the hoax, and you still seem to think he was stumped. What will it take to show you that this was a hoax?
gotank (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Have you not read the essay he wrote answering the question after the hoax came out? Or you so uninformed that you can't even understand his response?
vysehrad (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Any evolutionary biologist can and he has.
BuckTurgidson01 (2 months ago) Show Hide
 -10
Marked as spam

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.