The Human Eye is NOT Irreductibly Complex

Dear schmucks:

G-d is not incompatible with science.

Even Einstein, who was not a religious person, himself never declared himself to be atheist. "Religion without Science is lame, Science without religion is blind".

Maybe all you geniuses, including King Dawkins, who is your Supreme Ruler, are smarter than Einstein, and many minds including Da Vinci, Franklin and Lincoln who firmly believed in G-d?

If you want, believe in evolution.

Just don't be atheist garbage.

ofc god is not incompatible with science. You can believe in whatever religious or fantasy crap and still be perfectly normal and understand science.

The quote about einstein explains perfectly why i reply to your stupid comment: i love to laugh out loud right at the face of dumb creotards like you.

Da vinci also laughed at your crap. Lincoln was not scientist.

When are you going to: PRESENT ME ONE SINGLE MISTAKE AT THE WIKIPAGE ABOUT EVOLUTION?

come loser, do it,.

If you want to believe in the THEORY of evolution, fine, i have no problem with that.

Just don't be a moron schmuck that denies the existence of G-d.

All in all, I wish you well.

moron... science is not about belief.

You don't have to use "belief" in order to grasp reality. You can explain it all by using reason and empirical observation and experimentation.

for example: how the heck can i only "believe", if you are unable to provide me with one single mistake? i can only assume you can't refute the entire wikipage. Hence all things written there are facts.

but you, believing in god? that is pure belief, wanna see an example? explain disease, why do we suffer?

translantic said, "Da vinci also laughed at your crap." Well, in your case, the whole world is laughing at YOUR crap! XD XD XD XD
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAA

Nature never breaks her own laws.

Leonardo da Vinci

hence god does not exist. such would break the laws of nature.

God's law is EMBEDDED in the nature's law. Hence, nature's law is GOD's law. Simple logic, but never for the dolts! XD

Occam's razor: i don't need to add god to an explanation in order to understand what happens in reality.

god's nature are not of god, why not of the easter bunny? the santa claus?

do you need to associate god when you use math?

2+2= 4 in the name of god? lol

sorry, don't buy your delusional crap, please try:
PRESENT ME ONE SINGLE MISTAKE AT THE WIKIPAGE ABOUT EVOLUTION

Authority Appeal Bullshit. The oldest one.

Marked221,
While it does seem as though the evolutionary argument falls flat without any supporting reason, this video doesn't explain evolution fully enough to answer the questions you have. For example: Light sensitivity to focus. It would have been clearer if the video explained that something with light sensitivity has babies that vary in their degree of focus. The babies with clearer focus will survive more. Those babies will have babies with varying focus. Clear vision aids survival.