Change Player Size

Thomas Seymour and Elizabeth Tudor

Clips focusing on Thomas Seymour, 1st Baron Sudeley and Lord High Admiral (c.1508 - 1549) and his relationship with Elizabeth. Thomas Seymour was the second son of John Seymour and therefore brot...  
 

More From: littlemisssunnydale

Loading...

QuickList(0)

Upgrade to Flash Player 10 for improved playback performance. Upgrade Now or get more info.
This is a video response to Elizabeth I's childhood
125 ratings
Sign in to rate
60,641 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (0)

This video has no Responses. Be the first to Post a Video Response.
Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (110)   Options

Loading...
haroof (3 weeks ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Oh and I'd take Weir over Starkey when it comes to British Tudor history.

Starkey is a complete bore.
DarlingNikki2 (1 month ago) Show Hide
 -1
Marked as spam
To Gwyn142:

I believe that Dudley was weak and stupid in his ambitions because he did not have enough sense to get out of his own way and often times caused Elizabeth a great deal of personal and professional pain with his actions. As for loving her, I'm sure he did and she loved him as well, but he lacked discipline and common sense, in my opinion and Elizabeth was wise not to make him (or any man) her consort...
DarlingNikki2 (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Let me add in my comment to Gwyn142 that I do not appreciate my opinions being referred to as stupid. Can people not disagree without throwing around school yard insults like five year olds these days? I have a right to say what I please, within reason, as do you and anyone else. I try to make discussions pleasant, even engaging, so please show me some respect and I will show the same...
edemoness (1 month ago) Show Hide
+1
Marked as spam
if i was Elizabeth I sister i would have done everything to protect her and keep her safe in my arms from everyone who tried to do harm to her..then i would have those hanged, drawn, and quartered..and have them remember their alliegiance to Elizabeth I.
haroof (3 weeks ago) Show Hide
 -6
Marked as spam
BorgUnimatrix (3 weeks ago) Show Hide
+1
Marked as spam
haroof
No. She was shrewd, tactical and clever. She knew what she was doing and she also knew what she needed to do to survive. Her ambition was to become Queen. Dying for her religion isn't gonna help is it. To do so seems rather stupid really. Elizabeth was thinking and planning the future. Furthermost she ruled with her head and not with her heart.
zrtproductions (4 days ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
It's human nature to do what's neccessary to survive..Who's to say you wouldn't do the same in her position..

Don't say you know how you'd react, because you will most likley never be threatend with exectuion by your half sister.
DuttyGyal718 (1 month ago) Show Hide
+12
Marked as spam
"Little King Edward the 6th had stepped into his father's shoes, but they were several sizes too big for him."

Yeah. Imagine if he stepped into his father's clothes. :-D
GoddessofHyrule (1 month ago) Show Hide
+10
Marked as spam
women were blamed for all of men's evils back then.
waterlilyqueen (2 months ago) Show Hide
+17
Marked as spam
For a man who was supposed to be handsome and sexually appealing, this Thomas Seymour was pretty creepy looking.

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.