7,368 views
Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window
David Hicks vid from GETUP.
Upgrade to Flash Player 10 for improved playback performance. Upgrade Now or get more info.
3 ratings
Sign in to rate
182 views
© 2009 YouTube, LLC
And will always live with the foolish decisions he made. Like the fools who defend this DOG you will always have a battle because he's guilt is set in concrete.
Dick Head Hicks has said himself, and now he's not guilty! ha ha ha! "Let a man's yes be yes , and man's no be no". Like i said he's a DOG not a man.
Thurs, 20 November 08
On the 21 Dec 08, the current control order in respect of Mr David Hicks expires.
Following extensive consultation with a number of agencies, the AFP has decided it will not be seeking a further control order in respect of Mr Hicks.
The AFP has today advised the Attorney-General and Mr Hicks legal representative of its position.
The AFP will not be making any further comment in relation to this control order process.
(...guts to tell the truth... yeah sure. How's about you give it a go.)
--------------
It was Taliban camps with supposed al-Qaeda links. Get it right.
As US-backed Northern Alliance fighters routed Afghanistans Taliban in late 2001, they seized the fleeing young Australian at a taxi station. Then they sold him to the Americans for $1000.
"Intent"??? You're the tripper!
with intent to assist: (i) another country; or (ii) an organisation; that is engaged in armed hostilities against the Australian Defence Force...
So he's guilty if the Taliban were enemies of the Commonwealth at the time! (note, by contrast, that it is not necessarily a crime for an Australian to fight against the US, which explains the constantly shifting charges brought against Hicks there).
And don't forget, there are laws preventing forced confessions in Australia!
I called you un-American.
You are NOT an Australian.
You don't come from Australia
and you are not in Australia.
Is that clear enough for you?
You stupid Yanky wanker!
To sanction such presidential authority to order the military to seize and indefinitely detain civilians, even if the president calls them enemy combatants, would have disastrous consequences for the Constitution — and the country, the court panel said.