Loading...
Loading...
Highest Rated Comments
see all
All Comments (6)
-
Oh the baby!
-
Define "same job". Truly, if you are on $150,000 a year combined income you don't NEED the baby bonus.
-
I can't believe it's not baby...
-
what a wanker this is the bloke that is going to challenge rudd.
lol lmfao.
Loading...
“”
results
I love babies!
So do dingoes!
OK, let's take on board your advise. Let's say that I am my wife earns $100,000 a year. You and your wife earns $25,000 a year. My baby should be made equal with your baby (all babies are equal Brendan). Thus, we need to redress the balance of available money to the baby. Thus you now need to be paid $75,000 so that your baby is now on an equal footing to my baby.
Doesn't work too well now, does it?
Seriously, this was a stunt - a bad one. Logic is obvious not Nelson's strong point.