Complete video at: http://fora.tv/2007/10/13/G...
Pulitzer Prize-winning author and cultural historian Garry Wills discusses the origins of America's separation between church and state, and argue...
Pulitzer Prize-winning author and cultural historian Garry Wills discusses the origins of America's separation between church and state, and argues that this relationship has worked to the benefit of both interests.
-----
Garry Wills discusses his book "Head and Heart: American Christianities."
A prolific thinker and writer on history and faith, Wills tackles the evolving roles of the multiple denominations of Christianity throughout American history. He sees an ongoing tension between reason and emotion, which he believes is necessary and inevitable, and is clearly visible in the fervor of the religious right pitted against the enlightenment values of separation of church and state - Politics & Prose Bookstore
Garry Wills (PhD Yale, 1961) is an adjunct professor and cultural historian whose many books include penetrating studies of George Washington, Richard Nixon, the Kennedy family, Ronald Reagan, and religion in America. His numerous prizes include the Merle Curti Award of the American Historical Association, the National Book Critics Award, the Pulitzer Prize, and an honorary doctorate from the College of the Holy Cross.
Like to rate videos and let people know what you think?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Like to share videos with friends?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Who cares whether or not the founding fathers (last I checked, Jefferson and Madison were two of them) intended for there to be a "wall of seperation" b/w church and state. The FACT is that that is how it was interpreted, which should show you that THAT is what was deemed to best serve the country. You see, we INTERPRET our constitution to serve the changing needs of our society. If it were really up to the founding fathers, we'd still have slaves, disenfranchised women, etc. PROGRESSIVE!!!
elbethere: every time a fed. judge rules against a community, city, or state in public prayer, Christmas or Easter celebrations, or any other religious celebration they are violating the 1st amend. Read the 1st amend. again very carefully. It says "congress shall make no law". It doesn't say anything about any private group.
You are incorrect. The interpretation of the Constitution to state and local law is a product of the 19th century. As for the idea of "that statement" keeping government out of religion, how do you do that without keeping religion, as important a thing it is in daily lives and decision making of the people, out of government? Jefferson's letters, from which the statement comes, clearly illustrate his intentions and meaning in drafting the establishment clause.
The Establishment Clause goes on to say that there shall be no law establishing religion nor of prohibiting free exercise thereof.
It also means that if a community wants to have a day of prayer that is endorsed by the local government, that same government had better allow all religions equal access and expression of their own religious views. And this issue does not begin to address the issue of non-religious Americans.
elbethere: it was liberal judges who, in the early 20th cent., took Jefferson's private letter out of context and turned the 1st amend. upside down to meant the exact opposite of what the founders meant.
elbethere: That statement was meant to keep the fed. gov. out of religion. It was meant to keep the fed. gov. from creationg a national religion. No where in that statement does it say religion shall not participate in government decisions. BTW, no where in that statement are the words "sep. of church and state".
Its in the establishment clause to the first amendment. "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof"
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
It also means that if a community wants to have a day of prayer that is endorsed by the local government, that same government had better allow all religions equal access and expression of their own religious views. And this issue does not begin to address the issue of non-religious Americans.