Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

Global Warming

Global Warming is a "hot" topic. This video looks at the evidence and focuses on these two questions; Is the Earth getting warmer? and What ARE the effects of Carbon Dioxide in the atmosphere? C...  
 
Customize

QuickList(0)

Upgrade to Flash Player 10 for improved playback performance. Upgrade Now or get more info.
125 ratings
Sign in to rate
7,104 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (0)

This video has no Responses. Be the first to Post a Video Response.
Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (682)   Options

Loading...
wdgeo (2 days ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
@barsoapdish

Still lying to children for a living Soap-Bar-Boy?
Times are tough, I guess!
wdgeo (2 days ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Hello everyone!

YouTube user Potholer54 has a new video on climate change that addresses many of the unsubstantiated claims made by Cassiopeia Project and other Denialistas. /watch?v=w5hs4KVeiAU

I have also made a playlist of all four of his videos on climate change:
/view_play_list?p=BD29D0677E7D D9CE
wdgeo (2 days ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
(remove the space between the "D"s above)

/view_play_list?p=BD29D0677E7D D9CE <--remove any spaces
Pl00tz (1 day ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
@wdgeo Very comprehensive video's. Pretty much blows this video's baseless arguments out of the water
barsoapdish (3 days ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
You say that the Journal of Energy & Environment is a "bogus"?

Man, this really shows just how utterly stupid you are!
You had better do a little more research on subjects like this before you open your mouth......
barsoapdish (3 days ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Actually your assessment of journals etc. may not be based on stupidity, but rather, extreme bias and closed mindness due to the religious indoctrination of AGW.
garith21 (3 days ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Merely that it's not recognized as an academic source and it's listed as a trade journal.

Hurling insults is cute, and you like insulting me for "not doing enough research" but you barely realized it wasn't just my personal opinion when you typed the other statement and you don't realize that their papers don't actually go through the peer review process.

Heck you didn't even notice that some of the pieces the guy listed were opinion pieces, but who wants to think or look anyways.
garith21 (3 days ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Considering it's a collective argument based on many observations I would have to link other papers. Of course you could always look up NASA's publicly available paper, the MET offices statement.

Why you think I use national geographic or public broadcasting sources as a primary source is beyond me, just because you use blogs or opinion pieces doesn't mean I have to.

btw the only nature I'd use is the Scientific Journal Nature.
barsoapdish (3 days ago)
Comment removed by author
barsoapdish (3 days ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
I just gave you a link to 450 PEER REVIEWED papers that have EMPIRICAL data that disproves AGW.

I don't give a damn about your approval/disapproval of scientific journals.

Again, Find ONE peer reviewed paper that contains empirical evidence supporting AGW.

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.