Watch this video in a new window

Climate Change - Is CO2 the cause? - Pt 1 of 4

The first of four parts where Professor Bob Carter uses the scientific method on the popular theory with global warming being linked to CO2 levels. He examnines the hypothesis and it fails the test...  
 
Customize

More From: Bushvision

Climate change - Is CO2 the cause? - Pt 2 of 48:40
97,247 views
Evidence CO2 does not cause dangerous Global warming1:50
16,126 views
Climate Change - Is CO2 the cause? - pt 3 of 48:29
77,141 views
Climate Change - Is CO2 the cause?-  pt 4 of 49:35
82,900 views
Climate Change - Bob Carters 5 Tests of CO2 part 19:44
19,322 views
Past & Future Climate change - Pt 1of 49:21
17,917 views
Climate Change - Bob Carters 5 Tests of Co2 part 28:30
10,758 views
David Archibald - Global Warming & Sunspots explained9:35
26,057 views
Science & social aspects of climate change pt 19:24
4,548 views
Professor Fred Singer on Climate Change Pt  17:12
7,810 views
The Media & the global warming Hype - John Stossell9:41
9,835 views
Miskolczi`s New Greenhouse Law7:28
5,219 views
35 Inconvenient Truths part 19:48
13,627 views
Bob Carter Science & Social aspects of climate change pt49:37
2,156 views
Past & Future Climate Change - pt 4 of 44:30
6,561 views
Apocalypse? No! - Why there is no Global Warming Crisis9:43
28,705 views
Science & social aspects of climate change pt 29:29
2,611 views
The case against dangerousw global warming pt 29:05
917 views
Why the IPCC models are wrong - Part 18:34
7,193 views
Science & Social aspects of climate change pt 39:13
2,057 views

QuickList(0)

Featured Videos

Upgrade to Flash Player 10 for improved playback performance. Upgrade Now or get more info.
1,072 ratings
Sign in to rate
285,277 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...
Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (12,624)   Options

Loading...
gerjanp (1 hour ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
"The the entire north polar icecap is expected to be gone in ten years, does that SAY ANYTHING TO YOU"

Yes, that you are a fruitcake for saying it.
Nighttversionn (2 hours ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Puny tiny humans

Only a few billion of them. Not able to change the climate, no match for mother natures power. Only mother nature controls the thermostat.
Nightversionn (6 hours ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
You are completely divorced from reality.

The the entire north polar icecap is expected to be gone in ten years, does that SAY ANYTHING TO YOU

does it.
gerjanp (13 hours ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
@Nightversionn "18 scientific organizations reaffirmed their consensus with the IPCC just last October"

Then just last November (one month later) we found out just how unprincipled some of IPCC's principle players are.
Nightversionn (23 hours ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
18 scientific organizations reaffirmed their consensus with the IPCC just last October, that global warming is happening, and that it is being caused by human activity, and sent a letter to our US congress about it
BraniusBalki (1 day ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
what effect does an increase in CO2 create in an enclosed environment?, if scientists can answer this then people might see that relativity extends far beyond an ideal, and then might realize that this guy is a fucking fruit-loop.
SatoBrooks (1 day ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
@sailcats77
"Are you suggesting there are other more significant factors driving climate variations than CO2?"

Yes. I think that is correct. However, you seem to be saying CO2 from human activities has no significate effect. You have not proven this. That challenge is very difficult, and would make you famous if you could do so.
SatoBrooks (1 day ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
@sailcats77
"earth has risen to higher temps and at greater rates than during the last ~century, before modern industry even existed."

This does not serve as proof of your point that AGW isn't an issue.
You are outlining the sort of possibility that had to first be eliminated before AGW took hold as a meaningful explanation. Your opinion is representative of a 1970/80's level of understanding among some scientists. It is much harder to hold that belief today.
goog2k (1 day ago) Show Hide
+1
Marked as spam
JUST FOUND THIS:

Hottest January in UAH satellite record

Human-caused global warming easily overwhelms much-hyped "cold snap"
February 5, 2010

"The global-average lower tropospheric temperature anomaly soared to +0.72 deg. C in January, 2010. This is the warmest January in the 32-year satellite-based data record."

To see the graph of the "UAH Globally Averaged Satellite-Based Temperature of the Lower Atmosphere, 1979-2010"
Search:
Hottest January in UAH satellite record
goog2k (1 day ago) Show Hide
+1
Marked as spam
For an excellent scientific breakdown on lies and disinformation put out by Climate Change Deniers watchYouTubes:
The Big Swindle Movie
/watch?v=boj9ccV9htk

The Climate Change Denial Industry
/watch?v=DIGrkVoa78o&feature=r elated

Climate Change anatomy of a myth
/watch?v=EU_AtHkB4Ms

And UC San Diego:
The American Denial of Global Warming
/watch?v=2T4UF_Rmlio&feature=e mail

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.