The first of four parts where Professor Bob Carter uses the scientific method on the popular theory with global warming being linked to CO2 levels. He examnines the hypothesis and it fails the test...
The first of four parts where Professor Bob Carter uses the scientific method on the popular theory with global warming being linked to CO2 levels. He examnines the hypothesis and it fails the test. Inconvenient Truth author Al Gore would find his presentation contradicted by this presentation? Will kyoto`s greenhouse reduction goals be in vain?
Like to rate videos and let people know what you think?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Like to share videos with friends?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
18 scientific organizations reaffirmed their consensus with the IPCC just last October, that global warming is happening, and that it is being caused by human activity, and sent a letter to our US congress about it
what effect does an increase in CO2 create in an enclosed environment?, if scientists can answer this then people might see that relativity extends far beyond an ideal, and then might realize that this guy is a fucking fruit-loop.
@sailcats77 "Are you suggesting there are other more significant factors driving climate variations than CO2?"
Yes. I think that is correct. However, you seem to be saying CO2 from human activities has no significate effect. You have not proven this. That challenge is very difficult, and would make you famous if you could do so.
@sailcats77 "earth has risen to higher temps and at greater rates than during the last ~century, before modern industry even existed."
This does not serve as proof of your point that AGW isn't an issue. You are outlining the sort of possibility that had to first be eliminated before AGW took hold as a meaningful explanation. Your opinion is representative of a 1970/80's level of understanding among some scientists. It is much harder to hold that belief today.
Human-caused global warming easily overwhelms much-hyped "cold snap" February 5, 2010
"The global-average lower tropospheric temperature anomaly soared to +0.72 deg. C in January, 2010. This is the warmest January in the 32-year satellite-based data record."
To see the graph of the "UAH Globally Averaged Satellite-Based Temperature of the Lower Atmosphere, 1979-2010" Search: Hottest January in UAH satellite record
For an excellent scientific breakdown on lies and disinformation put out by Climate Change Deniers watchYouTubes: The Big Swindle Movie /watch?v=boj9ccV9htk
The Climate Change Denial Industry /watch?v=DIGrkVoa78o&feature=r elated
Climate Change anatomy of a myth /watch?v=EU_AtHkB4Ms
And UC San Diego: The American Denial of Global Warming /watch?v=2T4UF_Rmlio&feature=e mail
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Yes, that you are a fruitcake for saying it.
Only a few billion of them. Not able to change the climate, no match for mother natures power. Only mother nature controls the thermostat.
The the entire north polar icecap is expected to be gone in ten years, does that SAY ANYTHING TO YOU
does it.
Then just last November (one month later) we found out just how unprincipled some of IPCC's principle players are.
"Are you suggesting there are other more significant factors driving climate variations than CO2?"
Yes. I think that is correct. However, you seem to be saying CO2 from human activities has no significate effect. You have not proven this. That challenge is very difficult, and would make you famous if you could do so.
"earth has risen to higher temps and at greater rates than during the last ~century, before modern industry even existed."
This does not serve as proof of your point that AGW isn't an issue.
You are outlining the sort of possibility that had to first be eliminated before AGW took hold as a meaningful explanation. Your opinion is representative of a 1970/80's level of understanding among some scientists. It is much harder to hold that belief today.
Hottest January in UAH satellite record
Human-caused global warming easily overwhelms much-hyped "cold snap"
February 5, 2010
"The global-average lower tropospheric temperature anomaly soared to +0.72 deg. C in January, 2010. This is the warmest January in the 32-year satellite-based data record."
To see the graph of the "UAH Globally Averaged Satellite-Based Temperature of the Lower Atmosphere, 1979-2010"
Search:
Hottest January in UAH satellite record
The Big Swindle Movie
/watch?v=boj9ccV9htk
The Climate Change Denial Industry
/watch?v=DIGrkVoa78o&feature=r elated
Climate Change anatomy of a myth
/watch?v=EU_AtHkB4Ms
And UC San Diego:
The American Denial of Global Warming
/watch?v=2T4UF_Rmlio&feature=e mail